Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On editing the Journal: Ave atque vale.

F J Braceland

    The American Journal of Psychiatry
    |October 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    Dr. Braceland reflects on his 13-year editorship of the American Journal of Psychiatry, highlighting the introduction of peer review and the importance of clear, concise writing for medical journals.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Psychiatry and the returning veteran.

    Mental hygiene·2010
    Same author

    The wish to fall ill.

    Journal. Omaha Mid-West Clinical Society·2010
    Same author

    Psychiatry and atoms.

    Mental hygiene·2010
    Same author

    Psychiatric lessons from World War II.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2010
    Same author

    The William C. Menninger Memorial Lecture 1983. The National Association of Private Psychiatric Hospitals and its golden anniversary in American psychiatry.

    The Psychiatric hospital·1984
    Same author

    Bartholomew W. Hogan, M.D. 1901-1983.

    The American journal of psychiatry·1983

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Medical Journalism
    • Academic Publishing

    Background:

    • The American Journal of Psychiatry faced social turmoil during Dr. Braceland's 1965-1978 editorship, mirroring its founding era.
    • The journal's founding occurred 134 years prior to the start of his tenure.

    Observation:

    • Dr. Braceland introduced the peer review system to the Journal.
    • He analyzed the benefits and drawbacks of the peer review process.
    • The importance of clarity and brevity in medical journal editing and writing was emphasized.

    Findings:

    • Peer review is deemed essential in an era of increasing ultraspecialization.
    • Reports of the demise of medical journals are considered premature, despite existing challenges.
    • Dr. Braceland's tenure spanned 13 years, from 1965 to 1978.

    Implications:

    • The findings underscore the enduring value of peer review in maintaining scientific rigor.
    • Clear and concise communication remains paramount for effective medical journalism.
    • The future of medical journals, while facing challenges, is viewed with cautious optimism.

    Related Experiment Videos