Thrombelastography Compared with Multiple Impedance Aggregometry to Assess High On-Clopidogrel Reactivity in Patients

Diona Gjermeni1, Hannah Vetter1, Sofia Szabó1

  • 1Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Heart Center Freiburg University, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

Insights

High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) is common in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients after PCI, especially when assessed by thrombelastography (TEG). Conventional HPR definitions may need re-evaluation in this high-risk group.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Thrombosis
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increases ischemic risk.
  • The applicability of conventional HPR definitions in patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) is uncertain.
  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing PCI often require OAC, creating a complex clinical scenario.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare multiple platelet aggregometry (MEA) and thrombelastography (TEG) in detecting HPR in AF patients indicated for OAC post-PCI.
  • To evaluate the performance of established HPR cut-off values in this specific patient population.

Main Methods:

  • Observational, single-center cohort study.
  • MEA and TEG performed on days 1-3 post-PCI in 39 AF patients indicated for OAC.
  • Primary outcome: HPR defined by MEA (ADP AUC ≥ 46 U) or TEG (MAADP ≥ 47 mm).

Main Results:

  • The rate of HPR was significantly higher when assessed by TEG (64%) compared to MEA (3%).
  • Median ADP-induced aggregation was 9 U, and MAADP was 50 mm.
  • Within 6 months, the cohort experienced 10% deaths, 3% MI, and 23% bleeding events.

Conclusions:

  • TEG detects significantly higher rates of HPR than MEA in AF patients undergoing PCI.
  • Conventional HPR cut-off values may require re-evaluation for this high-risk population.
  • Further research is needed to correlate these findings with clinical outcomes.