Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motion artifact reduction with fast spin-echo imaging.

D D Stark, R E Hendrick, P F Hahn

    Radiology
    |July 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Introduction: rationale for colorectal cancer screening.

    Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR·2001
    Same author

    Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
    Same author

    Relaxation effects of clustered particles.

    Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2001
    Same author

    Noninvasive imaging of the biliary ducts.

    Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·2001
    Same author

    Hepatic iron concentration and total body iron stores in thalassemia major.

    The New England journal of medicine·2001
    Same author

    CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening: lessons from mammography.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2000
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Signal averaging significantly reduces image noise in abdominal MRI. Combining this with short repetition time (TR) and echo delay (TE) techniques further suppresses artifacts and enhances image quality.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
    • Radiology

    Background:

    • Abdominal MRI quality is often limited by systematic noise, including cardiac, vascular, respiratory, and peristaltic ghost artifacts.
    • Statistical noise, primarily from thermal effects, also contributes to image degradation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of signal averaging (n), repetition time (TR), and echo delay (TE) on systematic and statistical noise in abdominal MRI.
    • To identify optimal parameters for reducing motion artifacts and improving image quality in breath-hold abdominal MR images.

    Main Methods:

    • Evaluated the influence of signal averaging, TR, and TE on noise levels in eight healthy volunteers and 57 patients.
    • Analyzed the relationship between these parameters and various types of ghosting artifacts and statistical noise.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Quantified the sensitivity of noise and artifacts to changes in signal averaging, TR, and TE using power functions.
  • Main Results:

    • Signal averaging was the primary factor influencing both statistical and systematic noise, closely matching theoretical power function relationships.
    • All ghosting artifacts demonstrated consistent sensitivity to signal averaging.
    • Normalized systematic noise increased with longer TR and markedly with longer TE.

    Conclusions:

    • The short TR, short TE technique is effective for minimizing motion artifacts in breath-hold abdominal MRI.
    • Combining short TR/TE with signal averaging further suppresses artifacts, enhances signal-to-noise ratio, and optimizes anatomic resolution.
    • These findings provide a basis for optimizing MRI pulse sequences to improve diagnostic accuracy in abdominal imaging.