Vertebral mineral status: assessment with single- versus multi-section CT

A volumetric approach to quantitative single-energy computed tomography (CT) of the spine for trabecular bone evaluation was compared with the accepted single-section method in 32 thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies from six cadaveric specimens. Both 5-mm and 10-mm contiguous section sequences afforded greater sample volumes, mean mineral equivalent values, and precision than did the single midplane section technique. These findings can be explained by inhomogeneous trabecular distribution, differential bone resorption rates for various cancellous regions, and nonuniform deposition of marrow fat. Scoliosis may modify the net influence of these factors owing to altered biomechanical forces. Although the single-section method affords optimal sensitivity to early or subtle alterations in vertebral trabecular bone density, it may misrepresent the status of the total cancellous volume. Because three-dimensional histographic analysis includes structurally important peripheral trabeculae in determinations of mean mineral equivalent values, it may more accurately reflect vertebral body strength and risk of compression fracture.