Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
Published on: January 22, 2016
Patients with Methamphetamine Use Disorder Show Highly Utilized Proactive Inhibitory Control and Intact Reactive
Weine Dai1,2,3,4, Hui Zhou1,5, Arne Møller3
1CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China.
Abstract:
Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) is a chronic brain disorder that involves frequent failures of inhibitory control and relapses into methamphetamine intake. However, it remains unclear whether the impairment of inhibitory control in MUD is proactive, reactive or both. To address this issue, the current study used the conditional stop-signal task to assess proactive and reactive inhibitory control in 35 MUD patients with long-term abstinence and 35 matched healthy controls. The results showed that MUD patients with long-term abstinence had greater preparation costs than healthy controls, but did not differ in performance, implying a less efficient utilization of proactive inhibitory control. In contrast, MUD patients exhibited intact reactive inhibitory control; reactive but not proactive inhibitory control was associated with high sensation seeking in MUD patients with long-term abstinence. These findings suggest that proactive and reactive inhibitory control may be two different important endophenotypes of addiction in MUD patients with long-term abstinence. The current study provides new insight into the uses of proactive and reactive inhibitory control to effectively evaluate and precisely treat MUD patients with long-term abstinence.
Insights
Long-term methamphetamine use disorder patients show impaired proactive inhibitory control but intact reactive control. This suggests distinct endophenotypes for addiction, aiding in evaluation and treatment strategies for methamphetamine use disorder.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychiatry
- Addiction Research
Background:
- Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) is characterized by impaired inhibitory control and relapse.
- The specific nature of inhibitory control deficits (proactive vs. reactive) in MUD remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate proactive and reactive inhibitory control in abstinent MUD patients compared to healthy controls.
- To explore the relationship between inhibitory control and sensation seeking in MUD.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the conditional stop-signal task to differentiate proactive and reactive inhibitory control.
- Compared 35 MUD patients with long-term abstinence against 35 matched healthy controls.
Main Results:
- MUD patients exhibited greater preparation costs, indicating less efficient proactive inhibitory control.
- Reactive inhibitory control was intact in MUD patients.
- Reactive, but not proactive, inhibitory control correlated with high sensation seeking in MUD patients.
Conclusions:
- Proactive and reactive inhibitory control may represent distinct endophenotypes in MUD.
- Findings offer insights for tailored evaluation and treatment of MUD patients.
- Understanding these inhibitory control mechanisms is crucial for addiction research.
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Drug Dependence

