Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modified replacement randomization.

U Abel

    Statistics in Medicine
    |March 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a modified replacement randomization method for clinical trials, controlling treatment assignment imbalance. Computer simulations show how this method impacts selection bias and randomization list replacements.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Phase I/II intra-patient dose escalation study of vorinostat in children with relapsed solid tumor, lymphoma or leukemia.

    Klinische Padiatrie·2012
    Same author

    Continuous monitoring of toxicity in clinical trials - simulating the risk of stopping prematurely.

    International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2010
    Same author

    [Clinical studies beyond the German Drug Law. Studies for evaluating diagnostic tests].

    Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2009
    Same author

    [Methodological diversity in clinical research: an evaluation of the overall benefit for patients requires more than the randomised clinical trial].

    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin·2007
    Same author

    Comparison of p16(INK4a) expression with p53 alterations in head and neck cancer by tissue microarray analysis.

    The Journal of pathology·2006
    Same author

    [Patient compliance and efficacy of diagnostic procedures in the surveillance of colorectal cancer: experience from a cancer center].

    Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie·2005
    Same journal

    Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Trial Methodology
    • Biostatistics
    • Medical Research Design

    Background:

    • Randomization is crucial for unbiased clinical trials.
    • Replacement randomization is a technique used to maintain balance in treatment group sizes.
    • Existing methods may not sufficiently control for potential imbalances.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose and evaluate a modified replacement randomization procedure.
    • To introduce an imbalance criterion within a restricted range of patient entry numbers.
    • To assess the impact of this modification on selection bias and randomization list replacements.

    Main Methods:

    • A modification of replacement randomization was developed.
    • An imbalance criterion was imposed based on the maximum allowable difference in treatment assignments.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Computer simulations were used to study the procedure's performance in two-therapy clinical trials.

    • Main Results:

    • The study analyzed the dependence of selection bias on the parameters defining the modified procedure.
    • The mean number of randomization list replacements was investigated in relation to these parameters.
    • Simulation results provide insights into the trade-offs associated with the imbalance criterion.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed modification offers a controlled approach to randomization in clinical trials.
    • This method aims to minimize selection bias while managing randomization list replacements.
    • The findings are relevant for optimizing the design of comparative clinical trials.