Preanalytical Pitfalls in Untargeted Plasma Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Metabolomics of Endocrine Hypertension

Nikolaos G Bliziotis1, Leo A J Kluijtmans1, Gerjen H Tinnevelt2

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Translational Metabolic Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Metabolites
|July 27, 2022
PubMed

Insights

This study sought to identify biomarkers for endocrine hypertension (EHT) but found confounding factors like sample origin and age obscured results. No definitive biomarkers for differentiating EHT subtypes were identified due to complex preanalytical variabilities.

Area of Science:

  • Endocrinology
  • Metabolomics
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • Endocrine hypertension (EHT), encompassing primary aldosteronism (PA), pheochromocytoma and functional paraganglioma (PPGL), and Cushing's syndrome (CS), is often undiagnosed despite significant health impacts.
  • Identifying specific biomarkers for EHT subtypes is crucial for early diagnosis and improved patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish distinct metabolic signatures for different EHT forms using untargeted NMR metabolomics.
  • To investigate and correct for confounding variables, such as sample origin and age, in multicenter metabolomics studies.
  • To identify unbiased disease biomarkers for differentiating EHT from other forms of hypertension (PHT).

Main Methods:

  • Plasma samples from 231 EHT patients (104 PA, 94 PPGL, 33 CS) and 106 PHT patients were analyzed using untargeted NMR metabolomics across 13 biobanks.
  • Multivariate statistical analyses were employed to compare metabolic profiles and identify EHT-specific signatures.
  • Three distinct approaches were utilized to investigate and adjust for potential confounding effects, including sample center of origin and age.

Main Results:

  • Metabolic signatures were identified that could distinguish between PHT and EHT forms.
  • However, significant overlap was observed between EHT signatures and confounding factors related to sample center of origin and sample age.
  • The applied correction methods were limited by the study design, and no robust biomarkers for differentiating PHT from EHT were identified.

Conclusions:

  • The complexity and robustness of confounding effects, particularly preanalytical variabilities, pose significant challenges in multicenter metabolomics studies.
  • There is a critical need to establish consensus guidelines for handling preanalytical variabilities in retrospective metabolomics research.
  • Further research with standardized protocols is required to identify reliable biomarkers for endocrine hypertension subtypes.