Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Identification and Quantification of Deranged Metabolites in Critically Ill Patients Using NMR-Based Metabolomics
Published on: November 29, 2024
Preanalytical Pitfalls in Untargeted Plasma Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Metabolomics of Endocrine Hypertension
Nikolaos G Bliziotis1, Leo A J Kluijtmans1, Gerjen H Tinnevelt2
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Translational Metabolic Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Insights
This study sought to identify biomarkers for endocrine hypertension (EHT) but found confounding factors like sample origin and age obscured results. No definitive biomarkers for differentiating EHT subtypes were identified due to complex preanalytical variabilities.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolomics
- Biomarker Discovery
Background:
- Endocrine hypertension (EHT), encompassing primary aldosteronism (PA), pheochromocytoma and functional paraganglioma (PPGL), and Cushing's syndrome (CS), is often undiagnosed despite significant health impacts.
- Identifying specific biomarkers for EHT subtypes is crucial for early diagnosis and improved patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish distinct metabolic signatures for different EHT forms using untargeted NMR metabolomics.
- To investigate and correct for confounding variables, such as sample origin and age, in multicenter metabolomics studies.
- To identify unbiased disease biomarkers for differentiating EHT from other forms of hypertension (PHT).
Main Methods:
- Plasma samples from 231 EHT patients (104 PA, 94 PPGL, 33 CS) and 106 PHT patients were analyzed using untargeted NMR metabolomics across 13 biobanks.
- Multivariate statistical analyses were employed to compare metabolic profiles and identify EHT-specific signatures.
- Three distinct approaches were utilized to investigate and adjust for potential confounding effects, including sample center of origin and age.
Main Results:
- Metabolic signatures were identified that could distinguish between PHT and EHT forms.
- However, significant overlap was observed between EHT signatures and confounding factors related to sample center of origin and sample age.
- The applied correction methods were limited by the study design, and no robust biomarkers for differentiating PHT from EHT were identified.
Conclusions:
- The complexity and robustness of confounding effects, particularly preanalytical variabilities, pose significant challenges in multicenter metabolomics studies.
- There is a critical need to establish consensus guidelines for handling preanalytical variabilities in retrospective metabolomics research.
- Further research with standardized protocols is required to identify reliable biomarkers for endocrine hypertension subtypes.
Abstract:
Despite considerable morbidity and mortality, numerous cases of endocrine hypertension (EHT) forms, including primary aldosteronism (PA), pheochromocytoma and functional paraganglioma (PPGL), and Cushing's syndrome (CS), remain undetected. We aimed to establish signatures for the different forms of EHT, investigate potentially confounding effects and establish unbiased disease biomarkers. Plasma samples were obtained from 13 biobanks across seven countries and analyzed using untargeted NMR metabolomics. We compared unstratified samples of 106 PHT patients to 231 EHT patients, including 104 PA, 94 PPGL and 33 CS patients. Spectra were subjected to a multivariate statistical comparison of PHT to EHT forms and the associated signatures were obtained. Three approaches were applied to investigate and correct confounding effects. Though we found signatures that could separate PHT from EHT forms, there were also key similarities with the signatures of sample center of origin and sample age. The study design restricted the applicability of the corrections employed. With the samples that were available, no biomarkers for PHT vs. EHT could be identified. The complexity of the confounding effects, evidenced by their robustness to correction approaches, highlighted the need for a consensus on how to deal with variabilities probably attributed to preanalytical factors in retrospective, multicenter metabolomics studies.
More Related Videos
09:01Metabolomic Analysis of Rat Brain by High Resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Tissue Extracts
Published on: September 21, 2014
11:00Untargeted Metabolomics from Biological Sources Using Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry UPLC-HRMS
Published on: May 20, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...