Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Research on Candida albicans Biofilm-Associated Prosthetic Joint Infections
Published on: February 2, 2024
A Decision Support Framework for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Two
Vasiliy N Leonenko1, Yulia E Kaliberda1, Yulia V Muravyova2
1Faculty of Digital Transformation, ITMO University, Kronverksky Pr. 49A, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment strategies were assessed for cost-effectiveness. This study developed a decision support framework to rank PJI interventions by cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Health economics
- Medical decision making
Background:
- Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication of artificial joint surgery, often necessitating revision procedures.
- Effective treatment planning for PJI requires robust cost-effectiveness assessments to guide clinical and economic decisions.
- Current methods lack comprehensive frameworks for comparing diverse PJI treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply a composite decision support modeling framework for assessing the cost-effectiveness of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment strategies.
- To compare different PJI treatment methods based on associated costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.
- To provide ranked insights into the most cost-effective PJI interventions.
Main Methods:
- A composite decision support modeling framework was developed, integrating a discrete-event probabilistic model (decision tree) and a dynamic Markov model.
- The framework was applied to a dataset of 600 patient records from the Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics.
- Cost-effectiveness was evaluated by calculating costs and QALYs for various PJI treatment strategies using both implemented models.
Main Results:
- Two distinct comparative rankings of PJI treatment methods were generated based on the outputs of the discrete-event and Markov models.
- The study successfully demonstrated the application of the decision support framework in evaluating real-world patient data.
- The models provided independent yet complementary assessments of cost-effectiveness for different PJI interventions.
Conclusions:
- The developed composite decision support framework offers a valuable tool for planning and selecting optimal treatment strategies for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).
- Cost-effectiveness analysis, incorporating QALYs, is crucial for guiding resource allocation in managing PJI.
- The study provides evidence-based rankings to aid clinicians and policymakers in choosing the most effective and economical PJI treatments.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management

