Wolbachia wPip Blocks Zika Virus Transovarial Transmission in Aedes albopictus

Yan Guo1, Jiatian Guo2, Yifeng Li1

  • 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of High Technology for Plant Protection, Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Science, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Microbiology Spectrum
|July 27, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Wolbachia bacteria effectively block Zika virus (ZIKV) transovarial transmission in Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, particularly in the HC line. This research clarifies how Wolbachia protects ovarian cells, aiding in mosquito-borne virus control strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Vector-borne disease control
  • Microbial symbiosis in insects
  • Arbovirus transmission dynamics

Background:

  • Wolbachia is a promising biological control agent for suppressing mosquito populations and reducing arbovirus transmission.
  • Previous studies show Wolbachia reduces Dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) in Aedes albopictus, but transovarial transmission inhibition is not fully understood.
  • Understanding Wolbachia's effect on ovarian cells is crucial for assessing its efficacy in blocking virus transmission.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of Wolbachia in inhibiting ZIKV transovarial transmission in Aedes albopictus ovarian cells.
  • To compare ZIKV infection rates and viral loads in ovarian cells of Wolbachia-infected (GUA, HC) and uninfected (GT) mosquito lines.
  • To elucidate the mechanisms by which Wolbachia interferes with ZIKV replication and transmission within mosquito ovaries.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of ZIKV infection rates in progeny from GUA (native Wolbachia), HC (triple Wolbachia), and GT (Wolbachia-uninfected) Aedes albopictus lines across three gonotrophic cycles.
  • Quantification of ZIKV load in mosquito ovaries.
  • Analysis of the correlation between Wolbachia density and ZIKV load.
  • Assessment of host immune responses in Wolbachia-mediated viral inhibition.

Main Results:

  • HC mosquito progeny showed a complete absence of ZIKV infection across all gonotrophic cycles.
  • GUA mosquito progeny exhibited significantly lower ZIKV infection rates than GT (uninfected) mosquitoes in early cycles, with similar rates in the third cycle.
  • A strong negative correlation was observed between Wolbachia density and ZIKV load in mosquito ovaries.
  • No direct spatial overlap between Wolbachia and ZIKV was found in ovaries, suggesting host immune responses may be involved.

Conclusions:

  • Wolbachia confers significant protection against ZIKV transovarial transmission in Aedes albopictus, with the HC line showing near-complete blockade.
  • Natively infected Wolbachia in GUA mosquitoes also negatively impacts ZIKV, though to a lesser extent than in HC mosquitoes.
  • The findings highlight Wolbachia's potential as a key tool for controlling ZIKV and other mosquito-borne viral diseases by disrupting their transmission cycles.