Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

13:51
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
Published on: November 9, 2011
20.0K
Multimodal Feature Fusion Method for Unbalanced Sample Data in Social Network Public Opinion
Jian Zhao1,2,3, Wenhua Dong1,2,3, Lijuan Shi3,4
1School of Cyber Security, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 28, 2022
Summary
This study introduces a novel multi-modal emotion recognition method for social media analysis. It effectively fuses speech and text data, even with imbalanced datasets, improving public opinion insights.
Area of Science:
- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Natural Language Processing
Background:
- Social media analysis increasingly requires understanding multi-modal data beyond text, including voice and facial expressions.
- Multi-modal emotion recognition, particularly from speech, is crucial for accurate public opinion analysis but faces challenges with data imbalance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a multi-modal feature fusion method for emotion recognition using speech and text data.
- To address the challenge of sample disequilibrium in multi-modal datasets for improved emotion analysis.
Main Methods:
- Exploration of speech emotion feature retrieval techniques.
- Analysis of processing methods for imbalanced sample data.
- Development of a multi-modal feature fusion approach combining text and speech for imbalanced datasets.
Main Results:
- The proposed method achieved good fine-grained emotion recognition results on the IEMOCAP and MELD datasets.
- Effective fusion of multi-modal data, including speech and text, was demonstrated.
Conclusions:
- The developed multi-modal emotion recognition method provides a foundation for advanced social public opinion analysis.
- Addressing data imbalance is key to successful multi-modal emotion recognition in real-world social media contexts.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
28.3K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.3K
Cluster Sampling Method
12.6K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
12.6K
Group Polarization
35.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.3K
Stratified Sampling Method
12.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
12.7K
The Representativeness Heuristic
16.2K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.2K
Sign Test for Median of Single Population
176
In general, the sign test serves as a nonparametric method to test hypotheses about the median of a single population when the data does not follow a known distribution. This simplicity makes it particularly useful for small sample sizes or when the assumptions of parametric tests cannot be met. The process begins with identifying a null hypothesis, typically stating that the population median equals a specific value. The alternative hypothesis could be that the median is either not equal to,...
176

