Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

274
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
274
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

1.8K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
1.8K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

7.3K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
7.3K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

288
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
288
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

194
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
194
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.4K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Best practices in multilevel modeling for within-cluster group comparisons: An evaluation of coding strategies reflecting group composition and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Variable selection for explaining interindividual heterogeneity in longitudinal growth trajectories.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Correcting for measurement error under meta-analysis of z-transformed correlations.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2023
Same author

How do unobserved confounding mediators and measurement error impact estimated mediation effects and corresponding statistical inferences? Introducing the R package ConMed for sensitivity analysis.

Psychological methods·2023
Same author

Mediation analysis using Bayesian tree ensembles.

Psychological methods·2022
Same author

Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A cautionary tale on treating measurement error.

Psychological methods·2022
Same journal

Addressing selective reporting bias in meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes: A tutorial in R.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Heterogeneous variance models with Gaussian processes.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

Comparing methods for assessing a difference in correlations with dependent groups, measurement error, nonnormality,

Qian Zhang1

  • 1Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems, College of Education, Florida State University.

Psychological Methods
|July 28, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluates methods for testing differences in correlations, especially with measurement error or non-normal data. Structural equation modeling (SEM) offers robust solutions for these complex statistical challenges.

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
Flypub To Study Ethanol Induced Behavioral Disinhibition and Sensitization
08:13

Flypub To Study Ethanol Induced Behavioral Disinhibition and Sensitization

Published on: May 18, 2020

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
Flypub To Study Ethanol Induced Behavioral Disinhibition and Sensitization
08:13

Flypub To Study Ethanol Induced Behavioral Disinhibition and Sensitization

Published on: May 18, 2020

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Correlational Analysis

Background:

  • Fisher's z transformation is common for testing differences in correlations but can be inaccurate with measurement error or non-normal data.
  • Existing methods often use raw scores, neglecting potential issues like measurement error.
  • Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) provides a framework to address these limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare various statistical methods for estimating and testing differences in correlations (ρdiff) between two variables.
  • To evaluate the performance of these methods under conditions of measurement error, non-normality, and missing data.
  • To provide recommendations for appropriate statistical approaches based on study findings.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with latent-variable modeling to account for measurement error.
  • Employed maximum likelihood estimation (ML) with sandwich-type standard errors, bootstrap confidence intervals, and Bayesian credible intervals for non-normal data.
  • Assessed SEM frameworks under conditions of complete and missing data, including mean- and variance-adjusted likelihood ratio tests and bootstrapping model fit tests.

Main Results:

  • SEM effectively handles measurement error and non-normality when testing differences in correlations.
  • Different SEM approaches (ML with various intervals, Bayesian) show varying performance depending on data characteristics.
  • The study identified robust methods for testing ρdiff across different data conditions, including missing data scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • SEM is a recommended approach for testing differences in correlations, particularly when measurement error or non-normality is present.
  • The choice of specific SEM techniques (e.g., bootstrap vs. Bayesian intervals) depends on the data's distributional properties and completeness.
  • Findings guide researchers in selecting appropriate statistical methods for complex correlational analyses.