Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

A Mouse Model of Incompletely Resected Soft Tissue Sarcoma for Testing Neoadjuvant Therapies
Published on: July 28, 2020
Is the Addition of Anaerobic Coverage to Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis During Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection
Duncan C Ramsey1, Jorge R Walker2, Rebecca Wetzel3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Harlingen, TX, USA.
Background:
Wound complications are common after resection of soft tissue sarcomas, with published infection rates ranging from 10% to 35%. Multiple studies have reported on the atypical flora comprising these infections, which are often polymicrobial and contain anaerobic bacteria, and recent studies have noted the high prevalence of anaerobic bacterial infections after soft tissue sarcoma resection [ 26, 35 ]. Based on this, our institution changed clinical practice to include an antibiotic with anaerobic coverage in addition to the standard first-generation cephalosporin for prophylaxis during soft tissue sarcoma resections. The current study was undertaken to evaluate whether this change was associated with a change in major wound complications, and if the change should therefore be adopted for future patients.
Questions/Purposes:
(1) After controlling for potentially confounding variables, was the broadening of the prophylactic antibiotic spectrum to cover anaerobic bacteria associated with a lower odds of major wound complications after soft tissue sarcoma resection? (2) Was the broadening of the prophylactic antibiotic spectrum to cover anaerobic bacteria associated with a lower odds of surgical site infections with polymicrobial or anaerobic infections after soft tissue sarcoma resection? (3) What are the factors associated with major wound complications after soft tissue sarcoma resection?
Methods:
We retrospectively identified 623 patients who underwent soft tissue sarcoma resection at a single center between January 2008 and January 2021 using procedural terminology codes. Of these, four (0.6%) pediatric patients were excluded, as were five (0.8%) patients with atypical lipomatous tumors and two (0.3%) patients with primary bone tumors; 5% (33 of 623) who were lost to follow-up, leaving 579 for final analysis. The prophylactic antibiotic regimen given at the resection and whether a wound complication occurred were recorded. Patients received the augmented regimen based on whether they underwent resection after the change in practice in July 2018. A total of 497 patients received a standard antibiotic regimen (usually a first-generation cephalosporin), and 82 patients received an augmented regimen with anaerobic coverage (most often metronidazole). Of the 579 patients, 53% (307) were male (53% [264 of 497] in the standard regimen and 52% [43 of 82] in the augmented regimen), and the mean age was 59 ± 17 years (59 ± 17 and 60 ±17 years in the standard and augmented groups, respectively). Wound complications were defined as any of the following within 120 days of the initial resection: formal wound debridement in the operating room, other interventions such as percutaneous drain placement, readmission for intravenous antibiotics, or deep wound packing for more than 120 days from the resection. Patients were considered to have a surgical site infection if positive cultures resulted from deep tissue cultures taken intraoperatively at the time of debridement. The proportion of patients with major wound complications was 26% (150 of 579); it was 27% (136 of 497) and 17% (14 of 82) in the standard and augmented antibiotic cohorts, respectively (p = 0.049). With the numbers we had, we could not document that the addition of antibiotics with anaerobic coverage was associated with lower odds of anaerobic (4% versus 6%; p = 0.51) or polymicrobial infections (9% versus 14%; p = 0.25). Patient, tumor, and treatment (surgical, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) variables were collected to evaluate factors associated with overall infection and anaerobic or polymicrobial infection. Patient follow-up was 120 days to capture early wound complications. A multivariable analysis was performed for all variables found to be significant in the univariate analysis. A p value < 0.05 was used as the threshold for statistical significance for all analyses. No patients were found to have an adverse reaction to the augmented regimen, including allergic reactions or Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection.
Results:
After controlling for other potentially confounding factors such as neoadjuvant radiation, tumor size and anatomic location, as well as patient BMI, anaerobic coverage was associated with smaller odds of wound complications (OR 0.36 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.68]; p = 0.003). Other factors associated with major wound complications were preoperative radiation (versus no preoperative radiation) (OR 2.66 [95% CI 1.72 to 4.15]; p < 0.001), increasing tumor size (OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.00 to 1.07]; p = 0.03), patient BMI (OR 1.07 [95% CI 1.04 to 1.11]; p < 0.001), and tumor in the distal upper extremity (versus proximal upper extremity, pelvis/groin/hip, and lower extremity) (OR 0.18 [95% CI 0.04 to 0.62]; p = 0.01).
Conclusion:
The addition of anaerobic coverage to the standard prophylactic regimen during soft tissue sarcoma resection demonstrated an association with smaller odds of major wound complications and no documented adverse reactions. Treating physicians should consider these findings but note that they are preliminary, and that further work is needed to replicate them in a more controlled study design such as a prospective trial.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, therapeutic study.
Insights
Adding anaerobic coverage to antibiotics for soft tissue sarcoma resection significantly reduced major wound complications. This change in prophylactic antibiotic regimens shows promise for improving patient outcomes after sarcoma surgery.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Infections
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Wound complications, including infections, are frequent after soft tissue sarcoma resection, with rates from 10% to 35%.
- Atypical and polymicrobial flora, particularly anaerobic bacteria, are often implicated in these post-resection infections.
- A clinical practice change introduced anaerobic antibiotic coverage alongside standard prophylaxis for soft tissue sarcoma resections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if broadening prophylactic antibiotics to cover anaerobic bacteria reduces major wound complications post-soft tissue sarcoma resection.
- To assess if this expanded antibiotic coverage lowers the incidence of polymicrobial or anaerobic surgical site infections.
- To identify factors associated with major wound complications following soft tissue sarcoma resection.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 579 patients undergoing soft tissue sarcoma resection between 2008 and 2021.
- Comparison of major wound complication rates between patients receiving standard prophylaxis (n=497) and augmented prophylaxis with anaerobic coverage (n=82).
- Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with wound complications, with follow-up for 120 days.
Main Results:
- The augmented antibiotic regimen with anaerobic coverage was associated with significantly lower odds of major wound complications (OR 0.36; p=0.003) after controlling for confounding variables.
- Preoperative radiation, increasing tumor size, higher patient BMI, and distal upper extremity tumor location were associated with increased major wound complications.
- The study did not find a statistically significant reduction in anaerobic or polymicrobial infections with the augmented regimen, though rates were lower.
- No adverse reactions were documented with the augmented prophylactic antibiotic regimen.
Conclusions:
- The addition of anaerobic coverage to prophylactic antibiotics for soft tissue sarcoma resection is associated with a reduction in major wound complications.
- While not statistically significant in this study, the trend suggests potential benefits for specific infection types.
- Further prospective studies are recommended to confirm these preliminary findings and guide clinical practice.
More Related Videos
12:18Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus MRSA
Published on: February 9, 2011
13:37A Mouse Tumor Model of Surgical Stress to Explore the Mechanisms of Postoperative Immunosuppression and Evaluate Novel Perioperative Immunotherapies
Published on: March 12, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Asepsis