Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Brain Imaging01:14

Brain Imaging

299
Brain imaging technologies provide critical insights into both the structure and function of the human brain, enabling medical professionals and researchers to diagnose, study, and treat neurological disorders or psychiatric disorders more effectively.
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans),  magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),  functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic...
299
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists01:30

Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists

198
Cognitive enhancers, also known as "smart drugs," are substances used to enhance memory, mental alertness, and concentration. These can be natural or synthetic and improve cognition in conditions like Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative diseases. Some common examples include caffeine, amphetamines, methylphenidate, modafinil, arecoline, donepezil, vortioxetine, and piracetam. These enhancers work on the principle of synaptic plasticity and altered circuit function.
198

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing adverse effects and unspecific effects of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS).

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

A Novel Approach to Map the Causal Impact of Brain Stimulation on Semantic Processing With Language Models.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Stimulation success!? Improved response inhibition performance after prefrontal single-site and condition-and-perturb transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same author

The interoceptive origins of mental imagery: an evolutionary account.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Interoception predicts mental imagery vividness: exploring a key relationship.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

An integration model of mental imagery and aphantasia: Conceptual framework, neuromechanistic pathways, and clinical implications.

Neuropsychologia·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

28.9K

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: Multiple Effects on Cognition.

Gesa Hartwigsen1, Juha Silvanto2

  • 1Lise Meitner Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

The Neuroscientist : a Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry
|July 29, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) protocols are not inherently inhibitory or facilitatory. Instead, their effects depend on complex interactions between brain activity and stimulus characteristics, challenging simplistic views.

Keywords:
brain statefacilitationinhibitiontranscranial electrical stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulationvirtual lesion

More Related Videos

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Simultaneous Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
13:35

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Simultaneous Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: April 27, 2014

21.9K
Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

573

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

28.9K
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Simultaneous Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
13:35

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Simultaneous Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: April 27, 2014

21.9K
Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
08:53

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke

Published on: June 6, 2025

573

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Rehabilitation

Background:

  • Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are established tools for studying and rehabilitating cognitive functions.
  • Current applications often rely on a simplistic inhibitory or facilitatory dichotomy for stimulation protocols.
  • This limited conceptualization hinders the full potential of NIBS in research and clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the traditional view of NIBS protocols as solely inhibitory or facilitatory.
  • To propose a novel interactive model for understanding NIBS mechanisms of action.
  • To re-evaluate paradoxical findings in brain stimulation literature.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on noninvasive brain stimulation.
  • Development of a conceptual model integrating brain activity and external stimulus properties.
  • Analysis of previously paradoxical findings through the lens of the proposed model.

Main Results:

  • Stimulation protocols are not intrinsically inhibitory or facilitatory.
  • NIBS effects arise from complex interactions between the brain's internal state and external stimulation parameters.
  • The proposed interactive model successfully explains previously unexpected or paradoxical results in the field.

Conclusions:

  • A state-dependent interactive model offers a more comprehensive understanding of NIBS mechanisms.
  • This revised perspective can enhance the effective application of NIBS in basic science and clinical settings.
  • Moving beyond simplistic dichotomies is crucial for advancing brain stimulation research and therapy.