Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

12.0K

Test-retest reliability for common tasks in vision science.

Kait Clark1,2, Kayley Birch-Hurst1,3, Charlotte R Pennington1,4,5

  • 1University of the West of England, Department of Social Sciences, Bristol, UK.

Journal of Vision
|July 29, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When and Why Beliefs About the Causes of a Policy Problem Predict Policy Support.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

Declining trends in adolescent alcohol consumption and related harms: No room for complacency (an empirical reply to Vieira et al. 2025).

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Sensory sensitivity and visual discomfort are not associated with altered gamma oscillations: A test of the excitation-inhibition hypothesis.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

The Longitudinal Impact of Psychosocial Factors on Cognition and Hearing in Younger and Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Research methodology education in Europe: a multi-country, cross-disciplinary survey of current practices and perspectives.

Research integrity and peer review·2025
Same author

Are memorability judgements suggestible?

Memory (Hove, England)·2025
Same journal

AI-generated faces are becoming more trustworthy.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Attenuated boundary extension in observer perspective memory compared to field perspective memory.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Comparing masking and habituation roles in saccadic omission of stimuli optimized for intra-saccadic vision.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluated the test-retest reliability of four vision science tasks in 160 students. Visual working memory and motion coherence tasks showed good reliability for individual differences research.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Vision science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Traditional cognitive research focuses on average responses.
  • Growing interest in individual differences in cognition.
  • Concerns exist regarding the test-retest reliability of cognitive tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the test-retest reliability of four commonly used vision science tasks.
  • To determine which tasks are suitable for studying individual differences in perception and attention.
  • To provide recommendations for task selection in individual differences research.

Main Methods:

  • Tested 160 undergraduate students across two sessions (1-3 weeks apart).
  • Administered four tasks: motion coherence (MoCo), useful field of view (UFOV), multiple-object tracking (MOT), and visual working memory (VWM).

More Related Videos

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.5K
Vision Training Methods for Sports Concussion Mitigation and Management
12:54

Vision Training Methods for Sports Concussion Mitigation and Management

Published on: May 5, 2015

17.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

12.0K
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.5K
Vision Training Methods for Sports Concussion Mitigation and Management
12:54

Vision Training Methods for Sports Concussion Mitigation and Management

Published on: May 5, 2015

17.6K
  • Calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to measure reliability.

    • Main Results:

    • Visual working memory capacity (ICC=0.77) and UFOV outer accuracy (ICC=0.74) demonstrated excellent reliability.
    • MoCo threshold (ICC=0.60) and UFOV middle accuracy (ICC=0.60) showed good reliability.
    • MOT measures (ICC=0.36-0.41) and UFOV inner/number accuracy (ICC=0.30-0.48) exhibited poor to moderate reliability.

    Conclusions:

    • Task reliability varies significantly, impacting suitability for individual differences research.
    • VWM and MoCo tasks are promising for studying perceptual and attentional variations.
    • Careful consideration of test-retest reliability is crucial when selecting tasks for individual differences research.