Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication
Published on: December 15, 2023
Patient-facing communication for cytopathologists: A framework for disclosing diagnostic error
Cynthia K Harris1, Caitlin M Darrell2, Paul A VanderLaan3
1Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract:
Medical errors are a major source of harm to patients. Regulatory bodies mandate and patient safety experts advocate the disclosure of medical errors to patients to promote transparency and to create accountability for improving health care processes. Although pathologists regularly report errors-either to pathology or clinical colleagues or via internal safety reporting systems-few pathologists directly disclose those errors to patients. Yet many pathologists are interested in participating in the direct disclosure of medical errors to patients and may even be mandated to do so. When surveyed on why they do not directly disclose errors to patients, pathologists commonly cite a lack of confidence and a lack of training. Another barrier cited is the lack of a preexisting relationship between the pathologist and the patient. With respect to this last barrier, cytopathologists have a distinct advantage over surgical or clinical pathologists, as many cytopathologists regularly interact with and develop a rapport with patients when they are performing fine-needle aspiration (FNA) procedures. To improve the safety culture in pathology, direct error disclosure practices must be developed, supported, and strengthened. It is critical for cytopathologists to be comfortable with disclosing errors to patients. Being comfortable with disclosing an error, however, requires training, practice, and advance reflection. Using a practical, case-based format centered around FNA examples, this article addresses how to disclose a medical error to a patient. It provides a framework, heuristic principles, and structured conversation systems and talking points to guide the inexperienced pathologist to find his or her voice in a challenging disclosure conversation.
Insights
Pathologists often hesitate to disclose medical errors directly to patients due to lack of training and confidence. This guide offers a framework and practical advice, particularly for cytopathologists, to improve patient safety through open communication.
Area of Science:
- Medical error disclosure
- Patient safety in pathology
- Communication in healthcare
Background:
- Medical errors pose significant risks to patients.
- Regulatory bodies and safety experts advocate for error disclosure to enhance transparency and accountability.
- Pathologists infrequently disclose errors directly to patients, citing confidence and training deficits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the barriers pathologists face in disclosing medical errors directly to patients.
- To provide a practical framework and guidance for error disclosure, especially for cytopathologists.
- To strengthen patient safety culture within pathology through improved communication practices.
Main Methods:
- A case-based format using fine-needle aspiration (FNA) examples.
- Development of a framework, heuristic principles, and structured conversation systems.
- Guidance and talking points for pathologists to facilitate disclosure conversations.
Main Results:
- Identifies lack of confidence and training as key barriers for pathologists in error disclosure.
- Highlights cytopathologists' unique advantage in patient interaction during FNA procedures.
- Provides actionable strategies and communication tools for effective error disclosure.
Conclusions:
- Direct medical error disclosure is crucial for improving patient safety and healthcare accountability.
- Cytopathologists are well-positioned to lead in direct error disclosure due to patient interaction.
- Training, practice, and structured communication are essential for empowering pathologists in error disclosure.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...

