Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
The Association of Digital Health Application Use With Heart Failure Care and Outcomes: Insights From CONNECT-HF
Vishal N Rao1, Lisa A Kaltenbach2, Bradi B Granger3
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Insights
Mobile health apps modestly improved heart failure (HF) quality scores and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Further research is needed to confirm the benefits of digital tools for guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Digital Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- The impact of digital applications on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and outcomes for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains unclear.
- Assessing the efficacy of mobile health applications in improving care and outcomes for HFrEF patients is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether digital applications can enhance GDMT and improve clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with HFrEF.
- To evaluate the association between mobile health application use and quality of care scores in HFrEF patients.
Main Methods:
- An ancillary study of the CONNECT-HF trial prospectively evaluated a mobile health application among HFrEF patients.
- Digital users were matched to nonusers from the usual-care group.
- Coprimary outcomes included changes in composite HF quality scores and HF rehospitalization or all-cause mortality.
Main Results:
- Out of 2431 patients offered digital applications, 17% used them, 63% had limited access or data, and 20% declined.
- Digital users (n=368) showed improved composite HF quality scores (48.0% vs 43.6%; P=0.001) compared to matched nonusers (n=368).
- Digital users also experienced better composite clinical outcomes (33.0% vs 39.6%; HR 0.76; P=0.027) than nonusers.
Conclusions:
- Modest use of digital applications in the CONNECT-HF trial was linked to higher HF quality-of-care scores and improved clinical outcomes.
- The findings suggest that technology-guided GDMT use and dosing in HFrEF warrants further investigation, despite the study's observational nature.
Background:
It is unknown whether digital applications can improve guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Methods And Results:
Care Optimization Through Patient and Hospital Engagement Clinical Trial for Heart Failure trial (CONNECT-HF) included an optional, prospective ancillary study of a mobile health application among patients hospitalized due to HFrEF. Digital users were matched to nonusers from the usual-care group. Coprimary outcomes included change in opportunity-based composite HF quality scores and HF rehospitalization or all-cause mortality. Among 2431 patients offered digital applications across the United States, 1526 (63%) had limited digital access or insufficient data, 425 (17%) were digital users, and 480 (20%) declined use. Digital users were similar in age to those who declined use (mean 58 vs 60 years; P = 0.031). Digital users (n = 368) vs matched nonusers (n = 368) had improved composite HF quality scores (48.0% vs 43.6%; + 4.76% [3.27-6.24]; P = 0.001) and composite clinical outcomes (33.0% vs 39.6%; HR 0.76 [0.59-0.97]; P = 0.027).
Conclusions:
Among participants in the CONNECT-HF trial, use of digital applications was modest but was associated with higher HF quality-of-care scores, including use of GDMT and better clinical outcomes. Although cause and effect cannot be determined from this study, the application of technology to guide GDMT use and dosing among patients with HFrEF warrants further investigation.
More Related Videos
03:47Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure I: Introduction