Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
Rivalries for attention: insights from a realist evaluation of a postgraduate competency-based medical education
Christen Rachul1,2, Benjamin Collins3, Ming-Ka Chan4
1Office of Innovation and Scholarship in Medical Education, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, S204, Medical Services Building, 750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0W2, Canada. christen.rachul@umanitoba.ca.
Background:
Implementing competency-based medical education (CBME) in post-graduate medical education (PGME) is a complex process that requires multiple systemic changes in a complex system that is simultaneously engaged in multiple initiatives. These initiatives often compete for attention during the implementation of CBME and produce unintended and unanticipated consequences. Understanding the impact of this context is necessary for evaluating the effectiveness of CBME. The purpose of the study was to identify factors, such as contexts and processes, that contribute to the implementation of CBME.
Methods:
We conducted a realist evaluation using data collected from 15 programs through focus groups with residents (2 groups, n = 16) and faculty (one group, n = 8), and semi-structured interviews with program directors (n = 18), and program administrators (n = 12) from 2018 to 2021. Data were analyzed using a template analysis based on a coding framework that was developed from a sample of transcripts, the context-mechanism-outcomes framework for realist evaluations, and the core components of CBME.
Results:
The findings demonstrate that simultaneous initiatives in the academic health sciences system creates a key context for CBME implementation - rivalries for attention - and specifically, the introduction of curricular management systems (CMS) concurrent to, but separate from, the implementation of CBME. This context influenced participants' participation, communication, and adaptation during CBME implementation, which led to change fatigue and unmet expectations for the collection and use of assessment data.
Conclusions:
Rival initiatives, such as the concurrent implementation of a new CMS, can have an impact on how programs implement CBME and greatly affect the outcomes of CBME. Mitigating the effects of rivals for attention with flexibility, clear communication, and training can facilitate effective implementation of CBME.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Standards of Care II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Standards of Care I

