Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A 100-Day Workout Quality Improvement Project to Improve Value for the Care of Mental Health Conditions in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Pediatric emergency care·2026
Same author

Barriers to Health Care and Mental Health Among Parents of Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth.

Transgender health·2026
Same author

Cultivating Calm: Enhancing Resilience in Nursing Students Through Guided Meditation.

Holistic nursing practice·2026
Same author

Improving Preoperative Education for Pituitary Surgery Patients: Creation of Digital Educational Material.

The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses·2026
Same author

The National Pediatric Nurse Scientist Collaborative (NPNSC): A framework for advancing nursing science through integrative collaboration to improve pediatric and family health.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2025
Same author

Improving Pediatric fall prevention: Multicenter validation of the Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale 2.0.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2025
Same journal

Parental childhood vaccination hesitancy and refusal in Türkiye: A systematic review of contributing factors.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2026
Same journal

The effect of sticker intervention on children's pain and anxiety after invasive procedures.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2026
Same journal

Addressing Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy through Community Engagement: A Descriptive Evaluation of the VaxUpPhillyFamilies program.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2026
Same journal

Associations between healthy lifestyle belief among adolescents their sociodemographic characteristics and parental healthy life education conscious level.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2026
Same journal

A clinical pathway for young adults with medical complexity in a pediatric emergency department.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2026
Same journal

The effect of psychological resilience on caregiver burden among parents of children with special needs: The mediating role of internalized stigma.

Journal of pediatric nursing·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
06:59

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents

Published on: August 14, 2018

13.5K

The revised Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale: An update to improve tool performance and predictive validity.

Danielle Altares Sarik1, Deborah Hill-Rodriguez1, Karina A Gattamorta2

  • 1Nicklaus Children's Hospital, USA.

Journal of Pediatric Nursing
|July 31, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study refined the Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale (HDFS) by removing gender and medication factors. The modified HDFS improves pediatric fall risk prediction for safer hospital environments.

Keywords:
FallsHumpty dumptyPediatricsPractice measuresRisk classificationRisk factors

More Related Videos

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.9K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
06:59

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents

Published on: August 14, 2018

13.5K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.9K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Nursing
  • Patient Safety
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Hospital falls pose a significant risk to pediatric patients.
  • The Humpty Dumpty Fall Scale (HDFS) is a tool used to predict fall risk.
  • Enhancing the accuracy of fall prediction is crucial for patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify modifications to the HDFS to improve fall prediction accuracy in children.
  • To enhance the safety of hospitalized pediatric patients.
  • To refine existing fall risk assessment tools.

Main Methods:

  • Secondary analysis of 2428 patient records from Gonzalez et al. (2020).
  • Multiple logistic regression used to assess HDFS parameters against fall status.
  • Evaluation of factors including age, gender, diagnosis, cognitive impairments, environmental factors, surgical/anesthesia response, and medication use.

Main Results:

  • Gender and medication use were not associated with fall risk and were removed from the scale.
  • The HDFS was modified with a score range of 5-20; scores of 12+ indicate high fall risk.
  • The revised scale achieved 84% sensitivity and 57% specificity for fall prediction.

Conclusions:

  • The modified HDFS offers improved accuracy in predicting pediatric falls.
  • Revisions support clinical practice and enhance fall prevention strategies.
  • The updated scale contributes to a safer environment for hospitalized children.