Surveillance Imaging vs Symptomatic Recurrence Detection and Survival in Stage II-III Breast Cancer (AFT-01)
Jessica R Schumacher1, Heather B Neuman1, Menggang Yu2
1Department of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
|August 1, 2022
Summary
Early detection of breast cancer recurrence through asymptomatic imaging improved survival for triple-negative and HER2-positive subtypes, but not hormone-receptor-positive types. Further research is needed to confirm these findings for breast cancer patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Imaging
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Current breast cancer follow-up guidelines recommend imaging for distant metastases only when symptoms are present.
- These guidelines may not reflect recent advancements in imaging technology, systemic therapies, or understanding of breast cancer subtypes.
- The study investigates the impact of how distant recurrence is detected on patient survival.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the association between the method of distant breast cancer recurrence detection (asymptomatic imaging vs. symptom-driven) and patient survival.
- To determine if this association varies across different biological subtypes of breast cancer.
Main Methods:
- An observational study analyzed data from 10,076 women diagnosed with stage II-III breast cancer between 2006-2007, followed until 2016.
- Data included mode of recurrence detection (asymptomatic imaging or signs/symptoms), scan details, and patient outcomes.
- Propensity-weighted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between recurrence detection and survival.
Main Results:
- Distant recurrences were detected by asymptomatic imaging in 23.3% of cases and by signs/symptoms in 76.7%.
- Asymptomatic imaging detection was associated with a lower risk of death in triple-negative (HR=0.73) and HER2-positive (HR=0.51) breast cancers.
- No significant association with survival was found for estrogen receptor (ER)- or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers (HR=1.14).
Conclusions:
- Detecting distant recurrence via asymptomatic imaging, compared to symptom detection, is linked to improved survival for triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers.
- This association was not observed in ER- or PR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers.
- A randomized clinical trial is recommended to validate these findings and explore imaging surveillance strategies for specific breast cancer subgroups.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
269
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
269
Cancer Survival Analysis
434
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
434


