Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 7, 2020
MRI-Based Digital Models Forecast Patient-Specific Treatment Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative
Chengyue Wu1, Angela M Jarrett1,2, Zijian Zhou3
1Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Abstract:
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is persistently refractory to therapy, and methods to improve targeting and evaluation of responses to therapy in this disease are needed. Here, we integrate quantitative MRI data with biologically based mathematical modeling to accurately predict the response of TNBC to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) on an individual basis. Specifically, 56 patients with TNBC enrolled in the ARTEMIS trial (NCT02276443) underwent standard-of-care doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (A/C) and then paclitaxel for NAST, where dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI were acquired before treatment and after two and four cycles of A/C. A biologically based model was established to characterize tumor cell movement, proliferation, and treatment-induced cell death. Two evaluation frameworks were investigated using: (i) images acquired before and after two cycles of A/C for calibration and predicting tumor status after A/C, and (ii) images acquired before, after two cycles, and after four cycles of A/C for calibration and predicting response following NAST. For Framework 1, the concordance correlation coefficients between the predicted and measured patient-specific, post-A/C changes in tumor cellularity and volume were 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. For Framework 2, the biologically based model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.89 (sensitivity/specificity = 0.72/0.95) for differentiating pathological complete response (pCR) from non-pCR, which is statistically superior (P < 0.05) to the value of 0.78 (sensitivity/specificity = 0.72/0.79) achieved by tumor volume measured after four cycles of A/C. Overall, this model successfully captured patient-specific, spatiotemporal dynamics of TNBC response to NAST, providing highly accurate predictions of NAST response.
Significance:
Integrating MRI data with biologically based mathematical modeling successfully predicts breast cancer response to chemotherapy, suggesting digital twins could facilitate a paradigm shift from simply assessing response to predicting and optimizing therapeutic efficacy.
Insights
This study integrates MRI data with mathematical modeling to predict triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST). The developed model accurately forecasts individual patient outcomes, improving therapeutic evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiology
- Mathematical Biology
Background:
- Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents significant therapeutic challenges due to its resistance to conventional treatments.
- Accurate prediction of treatment response is crucial for optimizing neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) in TNBC patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a quantitative MRI-based mathematical model for predicting individual TNBC response to NAST.
- To assess the model's accuracy in differentiating pathological complete response (pCR) from non-pCR.
Main Methods:
- Integration of quantitative MRI (dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted) with a biologically based mathematical model.
- Analysis of data from 56 TNBC patients undergoing NAST in the ARTEMIS trial (NCT02276443).
- Two evaluation frameworks were used to calibrate and predict tumor cellularity, volume, and treatment response.
Main Results:
- Framework 1 showed high concordance (0.94-0.95) between predicted and measured patient-specific changes in tumor cellularity and volume post-chemotherapy.
- Framework 2 demonstrated superior prediction of pCR (AUC=0.89) compared to tumor volume alone (AUC=0.78).
- The model achieved high sensitivity (0.72) and specificity (0.95) in differentiating pCR versus non-pCR.
Conclusions:
- The biologically based mathematical model accurately captures patient-specific dynamics of TNBC response to NAST.
- This approach offers a significant advancement in predicting therapeutic efficacy, potentially guiding personalized treatment strategies.
- The integration of quantitative imaging and mathematical modeling holds promise for a paradigm shift in cancer treatment evaluation.

