Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

41.0K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
41.0K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

2.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
2.2K
Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

259
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
259
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

77.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
77.2K
Instrumentation Amplifier01:25

Instrumentation Amplifier

682
An electrocardiography (ECG) machine is an essential piece of medical equipment used to monitor the electrical activity of the heart. It operates by detecting small electrical changes on the skin that result from the depolarization of the heart muscle during each heartbeat. However, these signals are in the microvolt range and can be easily overwhelmed by noise or interference.
To overcome this challenge, an ECG machine utilizes an instrumentation amplifier. This specialized amplifier is...
682
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

12.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Instrumental Variable Estimation of Marginal Structural Mean Models for Time-Varying Treatment.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same author

Finding distributions that differ, with false discovery rate control.

Biometrika·2026
Same author

Combining Observational Studies to Reduce Multiple Biases.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Epigenetic inflammation signatures and lung cancer risk among never-smoking women: a nested case-control study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Ionising radiation and cancer: a UN review of the recent epidemiological evidence.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Effect measure modification in mixtures and public health.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
06:31

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Published on: October 3, 2019

8.7K

A Bespoke Instrumental Variable Approach to Correction for Exposure Measurement Error.

David B Richardson, Alexander P Keil, Jessie K Edwards

    American Journal of Epidemiology
    |August 2, 2022
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces a new method to correct for measurement errors in continuous exposure variables. The approach adjusts for bias in exposure-outcome associations without needing validation studies.

    Keywords:
    biascohort studiesepidemiologic methodsregression analysis

    More Related Videos

    Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter
    05:10

    Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter

    Published on: February 18, 2021

    3.5K
    Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
    08:27

    Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

    Published on: March 3, 2023

    1.0K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Sep 2, 2025

    Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
    06:31

    Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

    Published on: October 3, 2019

    8.7K
    Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter
    05:10

    Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter

    Published on: February 18, 2021

    3.5K
    Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
    08:27

    Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

    Published on: March 3, 2023

    1.0K

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics
    • Statistical Modeling

    Background:

    • Exposure measurement error can bias estimates of exposure-outcome associations.
    • Covariate adjustment is common but can be affected by exposure misclassification.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a novel method for correcting exposure measurement error in covariate-adjusted estimates.
    • To address bias in continuous exposure-outcome associations without traditional validation studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a statistical approach utilizing a reference population with known exposure levels.
    • Introduced the concept of "partial population exchangeability" as a key condition.
    • Employed simulations and a real-world example for illustration.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed method effectively corrects for bias due to exposure measurement error.
    • Demonstrated the utility of the approach under the partial population exchangeability assumption.
    • Showcased the method's applicability without requiring exposure validation data.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel approach offers a viable alternative for addressing exposure measurement error.
    • Partial population exchangeability is a crucial assumption for valid bias correction.
    • This method enhances the reliability of epidemiological findings affected by exposure misclassification.