Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Surgical Repair vs Stent for Esophageal Perforation: A Multi-institutional Database Analysis
Kelsey E Gray1, Anuja Sarode2, Boxiang Jiang1
1Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Esophageal stenting and surgical repair show similar mortality rates for esophageal perforation. Stenting, however, resulted in a shorter hospital stay, indicating comparable outcomes between these interventions.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Thoracic Surgery
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Esophageal perforation management often involves surgical repair.
- Endoscopic esophageal stenting is an emerging alternative, yet lacks extensive multi-institutional validation.
- Comparative outcome data between stenting and surgery are crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of surgical repair versus endoscopic esophageal stenting in patients diagnosed with esophageal perforation.
- To analyze mortality and other clinical outcomes using a large, nationally representative healthcare database.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of adult inpatients with esophageal perforation from the Premier Healthcare Database (2009-2019).
- Inclusion criteria focused on patients receiving either surgical repair or esophageal stenting within 7 days of admission.
- Logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the composite outcome of death or discharge to hospice, adjusting for patient comorbidities.
Main Results:
- The study identified 2543 patients, with 51.7% undergoing repair and 48.3% receiving stenting.
- While stenting use increased significantly from 2009 to 2019, initial analysis showed higher rates of death or hospice discharge post-stenting (16.2% vs. 10.2%).
- After adjusting for comorbidities, the adjusted odds of death or hospice discharge were statistically similar between esophageal stenting and surgical repair (OR, 1.074; P = .622), with stenting associated with a shorter hospital stay (P < .001).
Conclusions:
- Esophageal stenting and surgical repair demonstrate comparable rates of death or discharge to hospice for esophageal perforation when adjusted for comorbidities.
- Endoscopic stenting offers a potentially shorter hospital length of stay compared to surgical repair.
- These findings support esophageal stenting as a viable alternative to surgery for select patients with esophageal perforation.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....

