Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025
High Frequency Ultrasound for the Analysis of Fetal and Placental Development In Vivo
Published on: November 8, 2018
Utility of Measuring Fetal Cavum Septum Pellucidum (CSP) Width During Routine Obstetrical Ultrasound for Improving
Christy L Pylypjuk1, Shiza F Memon2, Bernard N Chodirker3
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (Section of Maternal-Fetal Medicine), Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Objective:
To evaluate the utility of measuring fetal cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) width during routine, mid-pregnancy ultrasound for improving diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome amongst fetuses with and without conotruncal anomalies.
Patients And Methods:
This was a retrospective case-control study (2005-2016). Fetuses and newborns with 22q11.2 deletion and/or conotruncal cardiac anomalies were identified using a regional, clinical database. A control group was assembled in a 2:1 ratio to create three groups for comparison: i) 22q11.2 deletion syndrome; ii) isolated conotruncal anomalies; and iii) controls. Eligibility was restricted to those with stored ultrasound images between 18-22 weeks' gestation and a minimum biparietal diameter of 40 mm. Post-processing measurement of CSP width was performed in a standardized fashion by two blinded and independent study personnel. Descriptive and inferential statistics, regression modeling, and receiver operator curves (ROC) were used to compare outcomes between groups and evaluate sensitivity/specificity of CSP width as a marker of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
Results:
Twenty-nine cases of 22q11.2 deletion and 64 cases of isolated conotruncal anomalies were matched to 186 healthy controls. Cases with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome had significantly larger CSP widths (5.36 mm; SD=1.2) compared to those with isolated conotruncal anomalies (3.75 mm; SD=1.11) and healthy controls (2.93 mm; SD=0.57; p<0.0001). There was no difference in CSP width amongst those with 22q11.2 deletion irrespective of the presence/absence of a conotruncal anomaly (p=0.362), or by type of conotruncal anomaly (p=0.211). Using a CSP width cutoff >4.3 mm, fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion can be accurately identified with good sensitivity (89.7%) and specificity (84%).
Conclusion:
Fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome have dilated CSPs when compared to those with isolated conotruncal anomalies or controls. Because CSP dilation can be evaluated during routine mid-pregnancy ultrasound using standard images of the fetal head, measurement could easily be incorporated to enhance prenatal diagnosis of this phenotypically diverse condition.
