MRD in Venetoclax-Based Treatment for AML: Does it Really Matter?
Massimo Bernardi1, Felicetto Ferrara2, Matteo Giovanni Carrabba1
1Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Department of Onco-Hematology, Milan, Italy.
Frontiers in Oncology
|August 4, 2022
Summary
Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is crucial for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prognosis. This review examines MRD interpretation in AML patients treated with venetoclax-based regimens, highlighting current challenges and future directions.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Prognosis for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unfavorable for many, often due to disease recurrence after remission.
- Measurable residual disease (MRD) detection post-treatment is a key prognostic factor, predicting relapse and enabling early intervention.
- Standard MRD detection methods include multiparameter flow cytometry and quantitative PCR, with next-generation sequencing offering broader applicability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and discuss recent data on the interpretation and role of MRD in AML patients treated with venetoclax-based combinations.
- To address the limited experience with MRD monitoring in patients receiving low-intensity regimens, including novel agents like venetoclax.
- To consolidate evidence regarding the impact of MRD negativity on outcomes in the context of venetoclax-based therapies.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent scientific literature and clinical data on MRD detection and interpretation in AML.
- Analysis of studies focusing on venetoclax-based treatment regimens in AML patients, particularly elderly or unfit individuals.
- Examination of established MRD threshold levels and their correlation with outcomes in intensive treatment settings.
Main Results:
- Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine shows good tolerability and high response rates in AML patients.
- While MRD negativity correlates with improved outcomes after intensive chemotherapy, supporting data for venetoclax-based regimens is still consolidating.
- Limited data currently exists on MRD monitoring and interpretation specifically for patients on low-intensity venetoclax-based treatments.
Conclusions:
- Further research is needed to establish definitive MRD monitoring strategies and interpretative thresholds for venetoclax-based AML treatments.
- Understanding MRD dynamics in patients receiving novel, low-intensity therapies is critical for optimizing treatment and improving patient outcomes.
- The role of MRD in predicting relapse and guiding therapeutic decisions in the era of targeted AML therapies requires continued investigation.


