Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Personalized Medicine in Ovarian Cancer
Published on: February 23, 2024
A New Approach to Simplifying and Harmonizing Cancer Clinical Trials-Standardizing Eligibility Criteria
David E Gerber1, Harpreet Singh2, Erin Larkins2
1Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Importance:
Clinical trial sponsors rely on eligibility criteria to control the characteristics of patients in their studies, promote the safety of participants, and optimize the interpretation of results. However, in recent years, complex and often overly restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria have created substantial barriers to patient access to novel therapies, hindered trial recruitment and completion, and limited generalizability of trial results. A LUNGevity Foundation working group developed a framework for lung cancer clinical trial eligibility criteria. The goals of this framework are to (1) simplify eligibility criteria, (2) facilitate stakeholders' (patients, clinicians, and sponsors) search for appropriate trials, and (3) harmonize trial populations to support intertrial comparisons of treatment effects.
Observations:
Clinicians and representatives from the pharmaceutical industry, the National Cancer Institute, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency, and the LUNGevity Foundation undertook a process to identify and prioritize key items for inclusion in trial eligibility criteria. The group generated a prioritized library of terms to guide investigators and sponsors in the design of first-line, advanced non-small cell lung cancer clinical trials intended to support marketing application. These recommendations address disease stage and histologic features, enrollment biomarkers, performance status, organ function, brain metastases, and comorbidities. This effort forms the basis for a forthcoming FDA draft guidance for industry.
Conclusions And Relevance:
As an initial step, the recommended cross-trial standardization of eligibility criteria may harmonize trial populations. Going forward, by connecting diverse stakeholders and providing formal opportunity for public input, the emerging FDA draft guidance may also provide an opportunity to revise and simplify long-standing approaches to trial eligibility. This work serves as a prototype for similar efforts now underway for other cancers.
Insights
Streamlining lung cancer clinical trial eligibility criteria simplifies patient access to therapies and improves trial generalizability. A new framework aims to harmonize populations and aid trial selection for better research outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Design
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- Complex eligibility criteria in clinical trials create barriers to patient access and limit generalizability.
- Overly restrictive criteria hinder recruitment, trial completion, and interpretation of results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a framework for simplifying lung cancer clinical trial eligibility criteria.
- To facilitate trial searching for patients, clinicians, and sponsors.
- To harmonize trial populations for improved intertrial comparisons.
Main Methods:
- A working group from the LUNGevity Foundation convened stakeholders from various sectors, including industry, regulatory bodies, and patient advocacy groups.
- A prioritized library of terms was generated to guide the design of first-line, advanced non-small cell lung cancer trials.
- Recommendations cover disease characteristics, biomarkers, performance status, organ function, brain metastases, and comorbidities.
Main Results:
- A framework for lung cancer clinical trial eligibility criteria has been developed.
- A prioritized library of terms for trial design has been created.
- This effort informs forthcoming FDA draft guidance for industry.
Conclusions:
- Standardizing eligibility criteria can harmonize trial populations.
- The emerging FDA draft guidance, with public input, can simplify trial eligibility criteria.
- This initiative serves as a model for other cancer types.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...