A New Approach to Simplifying and Harmonizing Cancer Clinical Trials-Standardizing Eligibility Criteria

David E Gerber1, Harpreet Singh2, Erin Larkins2

  • 1Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

JAMA Oncology
|August 4, 2022
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Streamlining lung cancer clinical trial eligibility criteria simplifies patient access to therapies and improves trial generalizability. A new framework aims to harmonize populations and aid trial selection for better research outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Complex eligibility criteria in clinical trials create barriers to patient access and limit generalizability.
  • Overly restrictive criteria hinder recruitment, trial completion, and interpretation of results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a framework for simplifying lung cancer clinical trial eligibility criteria.
  • To facilitate trial searching for patients, clinicians, and sponsors.
  • To harmonize trial populations for improved intertrial comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • A working group from the LUNGevity Foundation convened stakeholders from various sectors, including industry, regulatory bodies, and patient advocacy groups.
  • A prioritized library of terms was generated to guide the design of first-line, advanced non-small cell lung cancer trials.
  • Recommendations cover disease characteristics, biomarkers, performance status, organ function, brain metastases, and comorbidities.

Main Results:

  • A framework for lung cancer clinical trial eligibility criteria has been developed.
  • A prioritized library of terms for trial design has been created.
  • This effort informs forthcoming FDA draft guidance for industry.

Conclusions:

  • Standardizing eligibility criteria can harmonize trial populations.
  • The emerging FDA draft guidance, with public input, can simplify trial eligibility criteria.
  • This initiative serves as a model for other cancer types.

Related Concept Videos

Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
230
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
7.0K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
434
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
3.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
165
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.1K