Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Impact of the Cardioplegia Interval on Myocardial Protection Using the Modified St. Thomas Solution in Minimally
Kohei Nagashima1,2, Takafumi Inoue3, Hiroshi Nakanaga3
1Department of Clinical Engineering, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Insights
A longer cardioplegia interval (≥60 minutes) using the modified St. Thomas solution is safe and effective for myocardial protection during minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty. This study found no significant difference in cardiac enzyme levels between short and long intervals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Cardioplegia Solutions
Background:
- The optimal duration of cardioplegia intervals for myocardial protection remains unclear.
- Single-dose cardioplegia is considered useful, but safe interval doses require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of cardioplegia interval duration on myocardial protection during minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of a longer cardioplegia interval (≥60 minutes) using the modified St. Thomas solution.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 229 isolated minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty procedures (January 2014 - December 2020).
- Patients were divided into short (<60 minutes) and long (≥60 minutes) cardioplegia interval groups.
- Propensity score matching was employed to control for confounding variables, resulting in 47 patients per group for analysis.
Main Results:
- Postoperative peak creatine kinase MB and creatine kinase levels did not significantly differ between the short and long interval groups after propensity score matching.
- Multivariate analysis indicated no significant association between a cardioplegia interval of ≥60 minutes and peak creatine kinase MB levels.
- The study found the long interval dose method to be useful and safe in this patient cohort.
Conclusions:
- A cardioplegia interval of 60 minutes or longer, utilizing the antegrade modified St. Thomas solution, provides adequate myocardial protection in minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty.
- The findings support the safety and utility of extended cardioplegia intervals in this specific surgical context.
Abstract:
It has been reported that a single-dose cardioplegia interval is useful, but the safe interval doses are not clear. We aimed to investigate the impact of the cardioplegia interval on myocardial protection using the modified St. Thomas solution. We included consecutive isolated minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty procedures (n = 229) performed at a hospital and medical center from January 2014 to December 2020. We compared postoperative peak creatine kinase MB and creatine kinase levels and other indicators between the short (Group S, n = 135; maximum myocardial protection interval <60 minutes) and long (Group L, n = 94; maximum myocardial protection interval ≥60 minutes) interval groups. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounders between the two groups. After propensity score matching, Groups S and L contained 47 patients each. Groups S and L did not differ significantly in peak creatine kinase MB (45.8 ± 26.3 IU/L and 41.5 ± 27.9 IU/L, respectively; p = .441) and creatine kinase levels (1,133 ± 567 IU/L and 1,100 ± 916 IU/L, respectively; p = .837) after admission to the intensive care unit on the day of surgery based on propensity score matching. In multivariate analysis, a cardioplegia dosing interval ≥60 minutes was not significantly associated with the maximum creatine kinase MB level after admission to the intensive care unit on the day of surgery (p = .354; 95% confidence interval: -1.67 to 4.65). Using the antegrade modified St. Thomas solution, the long interval dose method is useful and safe in minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

