Direct electromagnetic coupling to determine diagnostic bone fracture stiffness
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025
Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
Published on: January 31, 2025
Jakob G Wolynski1, Milan M Ilić2, Kevin M Labus1
1Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Laboratory, Departments of Mechanical Engineering and School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Background:
Rapid prediction of adverse bone fracture healing outcome (e.g., nonunion and/or delayed union) is essential to advise adjunct therapies to reduce patient suffering and improving healing outcome. Radiographic diagnostic methods remain ineffective during early healing, resulting in average nonunion diagnosis times surpassing six months. To address this clinical deficit, we developed a novel diagnostic device to predict fracture healing outcome by noninvasive telemetric measurements of fracture bending stiffness. This study evaluated the hypothesis that our diagnostic antenna system is capable of accurately measuring temporal fracture healing stiffness, and advises the utility of this data for expedited prediction of healing outcomes during early (≤3 weeks) fracture recovery.
Methods:
Fracture repair was simulated, in reverse chronology, by progressively destabilizing cadaveric ovine metatarsals (n=8) stabilized via locking plate fixation. Bending stiffness of each fracture state were predicted using a novel direct electromagnetic coupling diagnostic system, and results were compared to values from material testing (MT) methods. While direct calculation of fracture stiffness in a simplistic cadaver model is possible, comparable analysis of the innumerable permutations of fracture and treatment type is not feasible. Thus, clinical feasibility of direct electromagnetic coupling was explored by parametric finite element (FE) analyses (n=1,632 simulations). Implant mechanics were simulated throughout the course of healing for cases with variations to fracture size, implant type, implant structure, and implant material.
Results:
For all fracture states, stiffness values predicted by the direct electromagnetic coupling system were not significantly different than those quantified by in vitro MT methods [P=0.587, P=0.985, P=0.975; for comparing intact, destabilized, and fully fractured (FF) states; respectively]. In comparable models, the total implant deflection reduction (from FF to intact states) was less than 10% different between direct electromagnetic coupling measurements (82.2 µm) and FE predictions (74.7 µm). For all treatment parameters, FE analyses predicted nonlinear reduction in bending induced implant midspan deflections for increasing callus stiffness.
Conclusions:
This technology demonstrates potential as a noninvasive clinical tool to accurately quantify healing fracture stiffness to augment and expedite healing outcome predictions made using radiographic imaging.
