Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
Published on: June 29, 2022
Ablation and antiarrhythmic drug effects on PITX2 +/- deficient atrial fibrillation: A computational modeling study
Ze Jin1, Inseok Hwang1, Byounghyun Lim1
1Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.
Introduction:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a heritable disease, and the paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) gene is highly associated with AF. We explored the differences in the circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI), which is the cornerstone procedure for AF catheter ablation, additional high dominant frequency (DF) site ablation, and antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) effects according to the patient genotype (wild-type and PITX2 +/- deficient) using computational modeling.
Methods:
We included 25 patients with AF (68% men, 59.8 ± 9.8 years of age, 32% paroxysmal AF) who underwent AF catheter ablation to develop a realistic computational AF model. The ion currents for baseline AF and the amiodarone, dronedarone, and flecainide AADs according to the patient genotype (wild type and PITX2 +/- deficient) were defined by relevant publications. We tested the virtual CPVI (V-CPVI) with and without DF ablation (±DFA) and three virtual AADs (V-AADs, amiodarone, dronedarone, and flecainide) and evaluated the AF defragmentation rates (AF termination or changes to regular atrial tachycardia (AT), DF, and maximal slope of the action potential duration restitution curves (Smax), which indicates the vulnerability of wave-breaks.
Results:
At the baseline AF, mean DF (p = 0.003), and Smax (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in PITX2 +/- deficient patients than wild-type patients. In the overall AF episodes, V-CPVI (±DFA) resulted in a higher AF defragmentation relative to V-AADs (65 vs. 42%, p < 0.001) without changing the DF or Smax. Although a PITX2 +/- deficiency did not affect the AF defragmentation rate after the V-CPVI (±DFA), V-AADs had a higher AF defragmentation rate (p = 0.014), lower DF (p < 0.001), and lower Smax (p = 0.001) in PITX2 +/- deficient AF than in wild-type patients. In the clinical setting, the PITX2 +/- genetic risk score did not affect the AF ablation rhythm outcome (Log-rank p = 0.273).
Conclusion:
Consistent with previous clinical studies, the V-CPVI had effective anti-AF effects regardless of the PITX2 genotype, whereas V-AADs exhibited more significant defragmentation or wave-dynamic change in the PITX2 +/- deficient patients.
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias

