A systematic review on the outcome of intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations

This study aimed to investigate the neurological outcome, trends and sequelae following surgical or conservative treatment of intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations (ISCCMs).

A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome measure was the change in the neurological status after surgery or conservative management. A logistic regression analysis investigating prognostic factors related to outcome was also performed.

Twenty-one studies with 1091 patients in total were included, of which 1005 (92.1%) underwent surgical resection and 86 (7.9%) were treated conservatively. Gross total resection was achieved in 95.7% of the patients and partial resection in 4.3%. Most lesions (60.2%) were located in the thoracic spine and presented with motor (60.4%) and sensory deficits (59.7%). In the long term, surgical treatment resulted in an improved neurological status in 36.9% of the patients, in 55.8% it remained stable, and in 7.3% it deteriorated compared to the preoperative state. In the conservative cohort, 21.7% improved, 69.6% remained stable, and 8.7% deteriorated. Solitary lesions, duration of preoperative symptoms less than 3 months as well as an improved post-operative neurological status were predictors of a favourable long-term outcome.

Whenever feasible, symptomatic patients with ISCCM are recommended to undergo surgery within 3 months from symptom onset. Absence of multiple lesions and, most importantly, post-operative symptom improvement foresee a favourable long-term outcome. Further research is warranted to discern the role of conservative treatment in symptomatic patients.