Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

09:12
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
71.2K
When and where does violence beget violence?
Yinzhi Shen1, Patrick Sharkey2
1Institute for Traffic Safety Management & Research, Rockefeller College of Public Affairs & Policy, University at Albany, NY 12205, United States of America.
Preventive Medicine
|August 6, 2022
Summary
Gun violence does not consistently lead to more violence the following week. However, during sharp increases in gun violence, recent shootings do causally increase future gun violence.
Area of Science:
- Criminology
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Gun violence is often conceptualized as an epidemic.
- Limited quantitative evidence exists on whether violence begets future violence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the causal relationship between shootings at week t and week t+1.
- To determine if this relationship varies across different urban contexts and time periods.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an instrumental variable approach using weather data to instrument for weekly shootings.
- Analyzed data from 98 of the 100 largest U.S. cities between 2014 and 2020.
Main Results:
- Overall, shootings in a given week had a null or negative effect on shootings in the subsequent week.
- A significant positive causal effect was observed during periods of sharp increases in gun violence.
Conclusions:
- The relationship between current and subsequent gun violence is dynamic, not static.
- Findings suggest that interventions may need to be context- and time-specific, particularly during violence surges.
Related Concept Videos
Aggression
28.0K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
28.0K
Bullying
8.5K
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...
8.5K
Bystander Effect
9.6K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.6K
Group Design
9.5K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.5K
The Scientific Method
61.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
61.2K
Group Polarization
35.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.2K

