Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Outcomes of a bypass-first strategy in chronic limb-threatening ischemia based on the Global Vascular Guidelines
Taira Kobayashi1, Masaki Hamamoto1, Takanobu Okazaki1
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, JA Hiroshima General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Insights
Distal bypass surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) shows good outcomes, including limb salvage and graft patency. These results support the Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) bypass recommendation for CLTI patients.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Peripheral Artery Disease
- Ischemia Management
Background:
- The Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) provide recommendations for revascularization in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).
- The decision for revascularization, particularly bypass versus endovascular therapy, is based on predicted outcomes.
- This study specifically evaluates outcomes following distal bypass in patients identified as candidates for bypass according to GVG criteria.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the real-world outcomes of distal bypass surgery in patients with CLTI who were recommended for bypass by the GVG.
- To compare outcomes between crural (leg) and pedal (foot) bypass procedures in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 239 distal bypass procedures for CLTI in 195 patients.
- Patients were selected based on a GVG bypass recommendation and treated between 2009 and 2020 at a single Japanese center.
- Outcomes including limb salvage, graft patency, wound healing, and survival were compared between crural and pedal bypasses.
Main Results:
- The cohort (195 patients, median age 77) underwent 133 crural and 106 pedal bypasses.
- 3-year limb salvage rate was 87%, with 3-year primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates of 40%, 65%, and 67%, respectively.
- 1-year wound healing rate was 88%. No significant differences in limb salvage, patency, or survival were observed between crural and pedal bypasses. 3-year survival was 52%.
Conclusions:
- Distal bypass surgery in CLTI patients with a GVG bypass recommendation yields acceptable limb salvage, graft patency, and survival rates.
- Outcomes were favorable regardless of whether the bypass was crural or pedal.
- The findings validate the GVG recommendation for bypass as an initial revascularization strategy in appropriate CLTI cases.
Objective:
The Global Vascular Guidelines (GVGs) recommend initial revascularization (bypass or endovascular therapy) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) based on anatomical complexity and limb severity. This decision is made based on a prediction of the outcomes after endovascular intervention. This study was performed to evaluate outcomes after distal bypass in cases recommended for GVG bypass.
Methods:
A total of 239 distal bypasses for CLTI were evaluated in 195 patients with a GVG bypass recommendation treated between 2009 and 2020 at a single center in Japan. Comparisons were made between crural and pedal bypass cases.
Results:
The 195 patients (median age, 77 years; 67% male) underwent 133 crural bypasses (106 patients; 54%) and 106 pedal bypasses (89 patients; 46%). Hemodialysis was more common in pedal cases than in crural cases (P = .03). Hospital deaths occurred in two cases (1%) within 30 days. The whole cohort has a follow-up rate of 96% over a mean of 28 ± 26 months, with 3-year limb salvage rates of 87% and 3-year primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates of 40%, 65%, and 67%, all without significant differences between crural and pedal cases. The 1-year wound healing rate was 88% and tended to be higher in crural cases than in pedal cases (P = .068). The 3-year survival rate was 52% in the cohort and did not differ significantly between crural and pedal cases.
Conclusions:
Patients with CLTI with a GVG bypass recommendation had acceptable limb salvage, graft patency, wound healing, and survival after distal bypass, regardless of the bypass method. These findings indicate that a GVG bypass recommendation as an initial revascularization method is valid in the real world.
More Related Videos
09:04Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Angina IV: Management