Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Cardiac amyloidosis and left atrial appendage closure. The CAMYLAAC study
Ignacio J Amat-Santos1, José R Delgado-Arana2, Ignacio Cruz-González3
1Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Spain; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Insights
Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) patients showed similar early complication rates to controls. While long-term survival was worse for ATTR-CA patients, LAAC may still be a viable option.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Electrophysiology
Background:
- Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) frequently coexists with atrial fibrillation, posing risks for stroke and bleeding.
- Patients with ATTR-CA often have higher comorbidity burdens and thromboembolic risk scores.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term outcomes of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with ATTR-CA versus those without a known CA diagnosis.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of LAAC in a high-risk population.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective comparison of patients who underwent LAAC between 2009 and 2020.
- Stratification of patients into two groups: diagnosed with ATTR-CA and without a known CA diagnosis.
- Long-term follow-up to evaluate complications, stroke, bleeding, and mortality.
Main Results:
- Successful LAAC was achieved in 98.1% of patients, with no significant differences between the ATTR-CA and control groups.
- No significant differences were observed in in-hospital or follow-up ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or bleeding events between the groups.
- While 2-year mortality showed no significant difference, 5-year mortality was significantly higher in ATTR-CA patients, independent of hemorrhagic or ischemic events.
Conclusions:
- LAAC is a safe procedure in ATTR-CA patients, effectively reducing bleeding and ischemic stroke risks without increasing early or mid-term complications.
- Despite impaired long-term survival in ATTR-CA patients, LAAC outcomes at 2-year follow-up were comparable to controls, suggesting its potential benefit.
Introduction And Objectives:
Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) patients often have atrial fibrillation and increased bleeding/thrombogenic risks. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) compared with patients without a known diagnosis of CA.
Methods:
Comparison at long-term of patients diagnosed with ATTR-CA who underwent LAAC between 2009 and 2020 and those without a known diagnosis of CA.
Results:
We studied a total of 1159 patients. Forty patients (3.5%) were diagnosed with ATTR-CA; these patients were older and had more comorbidities, higher HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and lower left ventricular function. Successful LAAC was achieved in 1137 patients (98.1%) with no differences between groups. Regarding in-hospital and follow-up complications, there were no differences between the groups in ischemic stroke (5% vs 2.5% in those without a known diagnosis of CA; P=.283), hemorrhagic stroke (2.5% and 0.8% in the control group; P=.284), major or minor bleeding. At the 2-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in mortality (ATTR-CA: 20% vs those without known CA: 13.6%, 0.248); however, the at 5-year follow-up, ATTR-CA patients had higher mortality (40% vs 19.2%; P <.001) but this difference was unrelated to hemorrhagic complications or ischemic stroke.
Conclusions:
LAAC could reduce the risk of bleeding complications and ischemic cerebrovascular events without increasing the rate of early or mid-term complications. Although long-term survival was impaired in ATTR-CA patients, it was comparable to that of patients without a known diagnosis of CA at the 2-year follow-up, suggesting that LAAC for patients with ATTR-CA might not be futile.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification

