Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
Published on: March 19, 2020
Utilization rates of Active Release Techniques® in the workplace: A descriptive study
1Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto M2H 3J1, ON, Canada.
Background:
Workplace safety is a necessary and frequent topic of discussion for researchers, employers, and workers. It is estimated that annual losses caused by work-related injuries cost the United States $140 to $145 billion. Specifically, work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) have risen from just over 10% to 50% of the total claims from 1952 to 1996, accounting for more than 345,00 days lost and more than $57 million in WSIB costs in 2015. Novel approaches to managing WMSDs, such as Active Release Techniques®, need to be explored to ensure the ongoing health of workers.
Objective:
This descriptive study provides the details of the 697,002 onsite treatments across 448 sites in North America between 2014-2018 provided by Active Release Techniques® Corporate Solutions (ARTCS) practitioners. The objective was to calculate the total number of treatments, cost per closed case, percent improvement, and the number of cases referred to worker's compensation.
Methods:
All charting was done on the ARTCS EMR portal. The lead author was given a spreadsheet of the results sanitized of all identifying data in order to perform the aforementioned calculations.
Results:
From 2014 to 2018, ARTCS providers opened 199,077 new cases, with an average cost to the employer of $306.69 USD per case and an average percent improvement in pain (VNPS) of 87.2%. The most frequently treated areas were the shoulder (32,574 cases), hip (6,633 cases), and low back (27,873 cases), respectively. A total of 48,946 cases were work-related pain/discomfort, of which 1,110 (2.27%) went on to worker's compensation.
Conclusion:
ARTCS in the workplace has shown a positive trend in terms of reducing pain intensity. The cost was low as compared to worker's compensation claims, as was the rate of cases (2.27%) referred to worker's compensation. Additional studies, including prospective data collection and a control group, are warranted to substantiate this.

