Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
When blame avoidance backfires: Responses to performance framing and outgroup scapegoating during the COVID-19
Gregory Porumbescu1,2, Donald Moynihan3, Jason Anastasopoulos4
1School of Public Affairs and Administration Rutgers University Newark New Jersey USA.
Abstract:
Public officials use blame avoidance strategies when communicating performance information. While such strategies typically involve shifting blame to political opponents or other governments, we examine how they might direct blame to ethnic groups. We focus on the COVID-19 pandemic, where the Trump administration sought to shift blame by scapegoating (using the term "Chinese virus") and mitigate blame by positively framing performance information on COVID-19 testing. Using a novel experimental design that leverages machine learning techniques, we find scapegoating outgroups backfired, leading to greater blame of political leadership for the poor administrative response, especially among conservatives. Backlash was strongest for negatively framed performance data, demonstrating that performance framing shapes blame avoidance outcomes. We discuss how divisive blame avoidance strategies may alienate even supporters.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
Framing Effects
Fundamental Attribution Error
Social Facilitation
Groupthink
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

