Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

146
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
146
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II01:18

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

1.7K
The person's health status fluctuates continually, varying from being in good health to becoming ill and returning to being healthy. To understand the concept of illness prevention, there are two models. First, the health-illness continuum model is a graphic representation of an individual's wellness. It states that a person is considered healthy in the absence of physical disease and the presence of good emotional health.
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
1.7K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.6K
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I01:25

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I

2.2K
A model is a theoretical way to understand a concept or an idea. Models can overcome barriers to health regardless of diverse economic and cultural backgrounds. In addition, models make the task easier by providing different ways to approach complex issues. There are two major health promotion models: the health belief model and the health promotion model.
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
2.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

164
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
164
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2025
Same author

Fifteen Lessons from Fifteen Years of the Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program in Thailand.

Health systems and reform·2024
Same author

International Partnerships to Develop Evidence-informed Priority Setting Institutions: Ten Years of Experience from the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI).

Health systems and reform·2024
Same author

Health technology assessment in India in the next decade: reflections on a vision for its path to maturity and impact.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2024
Same author

We need to talk about values: a proposed framework for the articulation of normative reasoning in health technology assessment.

Health economics, policy, and law·2023
Same author

Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K

Reinforcing Science and Policy, With Suggestions for Future Research Comment on "Evidence-Informed Deliberative

Anthony J Culyer1

  • 1Department of Economics and Related Studies and Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

International Journal of Health Policy and Management
|August 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study offers guidance on using deliberative processes in health technology assessment (HTA). It emphasizes objectivity in handling controversial issues and suggests future research directions for better healthcare decision-making.

Keywords:
ConsensusDeliberationHTAPolitical Bias

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K
Using a Virtual Store As a Research Tool to Investigate Consumer In-store Behavior
09:17

Using a Virtual Store As a Research Tool to Investigate Consumer In-store Behavior

Published on: July 24, 2017

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K
Using a Virtual Store As a Research Tool to Investigate Consumer In-store Behavior
09:17

Using a Virtual Store As a Research Tool to Investigate Consumer In-store Behavior

Published on: July 24, 2017

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Decision Science
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Deliberative processes are increasingly used in health technology assessment (HTA).
  • International practices in designing and executing HTA procedures involving deliberation vary.
  • Objectivity in handling moral and politically controversial issues within HTA is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a guide for good practice in using deliberative processes for health technology assessment.
  • To report on how different jurisdictions handle controversial issues in HTA procedures.
  • To suggest avenues for future research in deliberation and HTA.

Main Methods:

  • Based on a survey of international practices in HTA.
  • Analysis of how jurisdictions have designed and executed HTA procedures.
  • Identification of areas for future research and development.

Main Results:

  • Oortwijn et al. present a guide to good practice in deliberative processes for HTA.
  • The study highlights objective approaches to managing controversial issues in HTA.
  • Suggestions for future research are provided, building on current international practices.

Conclusions:

  • Continued development of deliberative processes in HTA is essential for effective healthcare decision-making.
  • Further research is needed on historical development, consensus-building, evidence management, and capacity building in HTA.
  • Enhancing awareness and use of HTA, knowledge translation and exchange (KTE), and deliberation among policymakers is vital, especially in low and middle-income countries.