Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging - Introducing the Spatially Weighted Calcium Score for Early Disease Detection
Published on: September 22, 2023
Coronary Artery Calcium Score to Refine the Use of PCSK9i in Asymptomatic Individuals: A Multicohort Study
Miguel Cainzos-Achirica1,2,3, Renato Quispe3, Reed Mszar4
1Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Department of Cardiology Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center Houston TX.
Insights
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring can help decide who needs PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). A CAC score of zero may indicate less need for PCSK9i in certain patient groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- The utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in guiding proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) therapy is unclear for individuals without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and without familial hypercholesterolemia.
- PCSK9i are potent lipid-lowering agents, but their optimal allocation in primary prevention requires refined risk stratification beyond traditional risk factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of CAC scoring in stratifying ASCVD risk within three distinct PCSK9i eligibility frameworks not requiring familial hypercholesterolemia.
- To determine if CAC can refine PCSK9i allocation strategies in primary prevention of ASCVD.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of participants without clinically evident ASCVD from four large cohort studies (MESA, CARDIA, DHS, HNR).
- Defined three PCSK9i eligibility scenarios: broad (high LDL-C), restrictive (high LDL-C + 2 risk factors), and high-risk (subclinical organ damage or high estimated risk).
- Assessed CAC=0 prevalence and its association with 5- and 10-year ASCVD event rates across scenarios, adjusting for traditional risk factors.
Main Results:
- The high-risk scenario exhibited the highest 10-year ASCVD event rate (27.8%).
- CAC=0 was present in 35% (broad), 25% (restrictive), and 16% (high-risk) of participants.
- CAC=0 was consistently associated with the lowest ASCVD incidence, and CAC burden independently predicted events, irrespective of the scenario.
Conclusions:
- Coronary artery calcium scoring can refine PCSK9i allocation, potentially supporting more conservative prescribing in individuals with CAC=0.
- CAC testing holds greater value in eligibility scenarios based on LDL-C and traditional risk factors, where CAC=0 is more prevalent.
- The utility of CAC is less pronounced when PCSK9i eligibility is determined by non-coronary subclinical organ damage.
Abstract:
Background The value of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in the allocation of PCSK9i (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors) among individuals without clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is unknown for indications that do not require confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia. We aimed to assess the ability of CAC to stratify ASCVD risk under 3 non-familial hypercholesterolemia PCSK9i allocation paradigms. Methods and Results We included participants without clinically evident ASCVD from MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study, DHS (Dallas Heart Study), and HNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall) study. Three PCSK9i eligibility scenarios were defined: a broad scenario informed only by high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (N=567), a restrictive one combining higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and presence of ≥2 additional risk factors (N=127), and a high-risk scenario where individuals with subclinical organ damage or high estimated risk would be treated to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <55 mg/dL (N=471). The high-risk scenario had the highest ASCVD event rates (27.8% at 10 years). CAC=0 was observed in 35% participants in the broad scenario, 25% in the restrictive scenario, and 16% in the high-risk scenario. In all, CAC=0 was associated with the lowest incident ASCVD rates at 5 and 10 years, and CAC burden was independently associated with ASCVD events adjusting for traditional risk factors. Conclusions CAC may be used to refine the allocation of PCSK9i, potentially leading to a more conservative use if CAC=0. The value of CAC testing is greater in scenarios that use low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and/or traditional risk factors to define PCSK9i eligibility (CAC=0 present in 1 of 3-4 patients), whereas its prevalence is lower when allocation is informed by presence of noncoronary subclinical organ damage.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

