Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

998
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
998
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

794
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
794
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.5K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.5K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

874
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
874
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

77.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
77.0K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immune-related nephritis, ureteritis and cystitis secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case report and review of the literature.

Experimental and therapeutic medicine·2026
Same author

Identification of the CYP19A1-GPER1 axis as a critical oncogenic driver in hepatocellular carcinoma via AKT activation.

Journal of translational medicine·2026
Same author

Cosolvent-Modulated Donor Preaggregation Enhances Molecular Order in 20% Efficient Bilayer Organic Solar Cells.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

Weakly Supervised Composed Object Re-Identification With Large Models.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same author

The prognostic significance of cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein and glucose (CHG) index in evaluating all-cause mortality risk in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) individuals: evidence from two cohort studies.

Cardiovascular diabetology·2026
Same author

Nicotinamide N-Methyltransferase Inhibition Mitigates Cerulein-Induced Pancreatic Fibrosis via Galectin-3-Mediated Regulation of Stellate Cell Activation and Macrophage M2 Polarization in Mice.

Inflammation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 2, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Robust Gaussian Process Regression With Input Uncertainty: A PAC-Bayes Perspective.

Tianyu Liu, Jie Lu, Zheng Yan

    IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
    |August 9, 2022
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a robust noisy input Gaussian process (GP) algorithm using PAC Bayes theory. The novel approach enhances accuracy and generalization for uncertain data, outperforming standard GPs.

    More Related Videos

    Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
    07:28

    Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

    Published on: January 21, 2017

    7.0K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    13.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Sep 2, 2025

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.2K
    Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
    07:28

    Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

    Published on: January 21, 2017

    7.0K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    13.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Machine Learning
    • Statistical Learning Theory

    Background:

    • Standard Gaussian Processes (GPs) require precise data and lack robust generalization guarantees.
    • Input perturbations can cause regression model mismatching in traditional GPs.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a novel robust noisy input GP (NIGP) algorithm for handling data uncertainty.
    • To provide numerical generalization performance guarantees on unknown data distributions using PAC Bayes theory.
    • To develop sparse NIGP and PAC-Bayes NIGP for reduced computational complexity.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a robust noisy input GP (NIGP) algorithm based on Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) Bayes theory.
    • Introduction of a sparse NIGP algorithm to mitigate computational demands.
    • Formulation of a sparse PAC-Bayes NIGP approach optimizing PAC-Bayes bounds for tighter generalization error bounds.

    Main Results:

    • NIGP algorithms demonstrate improved accuracy compared to standard methods.
    • The proposed PAC-NIGP algorithms achieve robust performance with uncertain input and output data.
    • Optimization of PAC-Bayes bounds offers a tighter generalization error upper bound than maximizing marginal log likelihood.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel PAC-NIGP algorithms effectively address data uncertainty in Gaussian processes.
    • These methods offer enhanced robustness and superior generalization error bounds.
    • The sparse PAC-NIGP approach provides a computationally efficient solution for complex datasets.