Medication Burden Among Pediatric Cancer Survivors: Analysis of a Population-Wide Electronic Database in Hong Kong

Celeste Lom-Ying Ewig1,2, Ka Ho Hui1, Samantha Lai Ka Lee3

  • 1School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

JNCI Cancer Spectrum
|August 10, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Pediatric cancer survivors often require chronic medications, with over a quarter needing them 5 years post-diagnosis. Chronic health conditions significantly increase the risk of medication use in these young individuals.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Limited research exists on the medication burden experienced by pediatric cancer survivors.
  • Understanding chronic medication use is crucial for long-term survivor care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the drug utilization patterns of chronic medications in young pediatric cancer survivors.
  • To identify factors associated with chronic medication use in this population.

Main Methods:

  • Population-based study of pediatric cancer patients in Hong Kong (2000-2013) surviving ≥5 years.
  • Defined chronic medication use as prescription for ≥30 consecutive days within a 6-month period.
  • Utilized multivariable log-binomial and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Main Results:

  • 27.4% of 2444 survivors required at least one chronic medication 5 years post-diagnosis.
  • Survivors with chronic health conditions (CHCs) had a 5.48 times higher risk of chronic medication use.
  • At 10 years, 33.4% of survivors used chronic medications, with higher rates for endocrine, renal, neurological, and cardiovascular disorders.

Conclusions:

  • Certain chronic health conditions increase the likelihood of starting prescription medications early in survivorship.
  • Further research should explore the impact of medication burden on survivors' functional status.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.1K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
433
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.4K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
224