Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Exploring the use of water resource recovery facility instrument data to visualise dynamic resilience to
Timothy G Holloway1, John B Williams1, Djamila Ouelhadj2
1School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Water resource recovery facilities (WRRF) face increasingly dynamic stressors, such as higher rainfall intensity and extended dry periods, which can exert stress on ageing water infrastructure and processes. These events can generate process stresses, which lead to wastewater process failures which result in pollution events that could be identified from instrument data used for operational/compliance monitoring. This extraction can be performed on two levels (1) for discrete processes that generate data to monitor process control variables and (2) at the WRRF process boundary (global), which is mainly used for compliance. Both levels of data hold valuable information on the dynamic influence of environmental stressors (cause) and the resulting process stress or resilience (effect) as 'dynamic resilience'. This paper proposes a novel methodology that uses actual water company instrument data to evaluate the 'discrete' (unit processes) and 'global' (WRRF boundary) dynamic resilience of a WRRF in the south of the UK. Dynamic resilience is presented as a four-stage methodology, which; (1) cleans WRRF data and extracts a standard operating condition; (2) identifies dynamic high and low flow environmental stressor events (one in five years); (3) models the process stresses and resilience generated by the imposed dynamic stressor before; (4) generating a contoured heat map of process-related stresses or resilience as a self ordering window. These methods demonstrate the possibility of visualising the dynamics of WRRF resilience (dynamic stressors and process stresses/resilience) resulting from high and low flow dynamic environmental stressors. Despite some challenges experienced with self ordering window scaling, the results demonstrate the possibility of identifying zones of process stress and resilience. It may also be possible to expand the methods developed to incorporate storm flows and combined sewer discharges.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Quality of Water
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Testing Water Quality
Rapidly Varying Flow

