Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
Published on: July 17, 2021
Closeness Discrepancies in Couple Relationships: A Dyadic Response Surface Analysis
Sebastian Pusch1, Franz J Neyer1, Birk Hagemeyer1
1Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Germany.
Abstract:
Individuals can differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their romantic relationships: Some people may perceive their current level of closeness as just right, whereas others may feel not close enough or too close to their partners (referred to as negative and positive closeness discrepancy, respectively). This study (N = 1,177 individuals from 748 couples) examined the implications of closeness discrepancies for subjective relationship quality (SRQ) using dyadic response surface analysis. The analyses found evidence for linear, but not broad, closeness discrepancy effects: SRQ was lower for individuals reporting more negative closeness discrepancies and, independent of this actor effect, for individuals with partners who reported more negative closeness discrepancies. These results suggest that low levels of closeness paired with a strong desire for closeness can impair both partners' relational well-being.
Related Concept Videos
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Relationship Formation
Two-Way ANOVA
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

