Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Macerated Tissue to Visualize the Extracellular Matrix
Published on: June 14, 2016
A New Matrix for Soft Tissue Management
Daniele De Santis1, Umberto Luciano1, Paola Pancera1
1Head and Neck Department, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy.
Connective tissue grafts (CTG) are superior to xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) for treating gingival recession, offering better root coverage and gingival thickness. While XCM shows slight benefits over no graft, CTG remains the gold standard for root coverage.
Area of Science:
- Periodontology
- Regenerative Dentistry
- Mucogingival Surgery
Background:
- Gingival recession, an apical shift of the gingival margin from the cement-enamel junction (CEJ), is a common mucogingival defect.
- Connective tissue grafts (CTG) provide excellent results for treating gingival recession but have associated disadvantages.
- Xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) presents an alternative material for root coverage procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis on the clinical efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) for treating gingival recessions.
- To compare the outcomes of XCM with connective tissue grafts (CTG) and alone in root coverage procedures.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review conducted following Cochrane Handbook guidelines.
- Meta-analysis performed to calculate relative risks and standardized mean differences for clinical variables.
- Comparison of outcomes for connective flap surgery + connective tissue graft (CAF + CTG) versus connective flap surgery + xenogeneic collagen matrix (CAF + XCM) and connective flap surgery alone (CAF).
Main Results:
- CAF + CTG demonstrated statistically significant superiority over CAF + XCM in complete root coverage, mean root coverage, recession reduction, clinical attachment level, and gingival thickness.
- CAF + XCM showed slight advantages over CAF alone in mean root coverage, recession reduction, and gingival thickness.
- Specific relative risk (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) values were reported for each variable, indicating the magnitude of differences.
Conclusions:
- Connective tissue grafts (CTG), when used with connective flap surgery (CAF + CTG), remain the gold standard for achieving root coverage.
- Xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) offers some benefits compared to no grafting material but is less effective than CTG for root coverage procedures.
- Further research may be needed to optimize the use of XCM or identify specific indications where it could be a viable alternative.
More Related Videos
05:37Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
11:36Voxel Printing Anatomy: Design and Fabrication of Realistic, Presurgical Planning Models through Bitmap Printing
Published on: February 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
The Bone Matrix
Overview of Muscle Tissues
Elasticity
Elasticity is the ability of muscles to stretch and return to their original shape. This property is partly due to elastic fibers — macromolecules that run through the muscles. These fibers are firm and...
Tissues
Tissue Renewal without Stem Cells
However, failure of such a system...