Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

06:54
Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
Published on: June 21, 2019
6.0K
Labels Affect Food Choices, but in What Ways?
Swen J Kühne1, Ester Reijnen1, Gracinda Granja1
1School of Applied Psychology, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Pfingstweidstrasse 96, P.O. Box 707, CH-8037 Zürich, Switzerland.
Nutrients
|August 12, 2022
Summary
Front-of-pack (FOP) labels on food products surprisingly increased overall purchases, including calories, despite identifying healthier options. Different label types had varied impacts on specific nutrient choices, like sugar reduction.
Area of Science:
- Consumer Behavior
- Nutritional Science
- Food Labeling Policy
Background:
- Front-of-pack (FOP) labels aim to guide consumers toward healthier food choices to combat obesity.
- Previous research indicates FOP labels have a limited impact on actual purchasing decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the differential effects of summary versus nutrient-specific FOP labels on food choices.
- To examine how label types influence the selection of healthier options based on metrics like calories and sugar.
Main Methods:
- A swipe task simulation involving 354 observers purchasing groceries for a group.
- Random assignment to five conditions: Nutri-Score, Health Flag (HFL), sugar-specific (manga, comic) labels, or a no-label control.
- Analysis of purchased products, total calories, and specific nutrient content (sugar).
Main Results:
- FOP label conditions resulted in a significant increase in the number of products purchased (+7.3) and total calories (+1732 kcal) compared to the control.
- Different label types demonstrated varied effects on specific nutrient purchases; for example, manga labels reduced sugar acquisition.
- An 'averaging bias' or 'licensing effect' is proposed, where purchasing healthy items may license the purchase of unhealthy ones.
Conclusions:
- FOP labels, while identifying healthy foods, may inadvertently increase overall consumption due to compensatory purchasing behaviors.
- The effectiveness of FOP labels varies depending on the label type and the specific health metric considered.
- Further research is needed to understand the complex interplay between FOP labeling, consumer psychology, and food purchasing behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Labeling Emotion
231
Emotional labeling is a cognitive process that involves identifying and naming one's emotions, such as anger, fear, happiness, or sadness. It allows individuals to recognize and express their internal emotional states, a critical aspect of emotional regulation and communication. Labeling emotions requires more than mere recognition; it also involves drawing upon memory and contextual cues to understand the current situation and apply a corresponding emotional label. For instance, feeling...
231
Taste Buds and Receptors
2.6K
Gustation, or the sense of taste, is intrinsically linked to the anatomical structures located on the tongue. This organ's surface, along with the entirety of the oral cavity, is adorned with stratified squamous epithelium. Evident on the tongue are elevated structures known as papillae (singular = papilla), which house the mechanisms for the transduction of gustatory stimuli. Four distinct types of papillae exist, each identified by their unique morphological attributes: the circumvallate,...
2.6K
Conditioned Taste Aversion
219
Conditioned taste aversion, also known as sauce béarnaise syndrome, is a phenomenon in which an individual develops an aversion to a certain food taste following a negative experience, typically illness. This form of aversion is a type of classical conditioning in which the taste of the food (conditioned stimulus, CS) is associated with the experience of illness (unconditioned stimulus, UCS).
A notable characteristic of conditioned taste aversion is that it often requires only a single...
A notable characteristic of conditioned taste aversion is that it often requires only a single...
219
Framing Effects
7.5K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.5K
Self-Schemas
32.0K
In general, a schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
32.0K
Confirmation Biases
6.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
6.5K

