Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students
Published on: June 16, 2018
Are Psychophysiological Wearables Suitable for Comparing Pedagogical Teaching Approaches?
Vesna Geršak1, Tina Giber1, Gregor Geršak2
1Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Wearable devices in elementary science classes revealed that embodied teaching boosted student engagement and immediate knowledge gain. However, long-term retention showed no significant differences across frontal, embodied, or distance learning methods.
Area of Science:
- Educational Technology
- Cognitive Science
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Traditional teaching methods may not fully engage all students.
- Objective measurement tools are needed to evaluate pedagogical approaches.
- Wearable technology offers potential for real-time data collection in educational settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of wearable devices for comparing teaching methods in elementary science education.
- To assess the impact of frontal, embodied, and distance teaching on student psychological arousal, well-being, and physiological synchronization.
- To evaluate short-term and long-term knowledge gain associated with different teaching strategies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized upper arm wearable devices to objectively measure student physical activity and psychological arousal.
- Compared three science teaching approaches: classical frontal, embodied (kinesthetic), and distance learning.
- Assessed physiological synchronization between teachers and students using a defined synchronization index.
- Measured immediate and long-term knowledge acquisition.
Main Results:
- Distance teaching resulted in significantly lower student physical activity and psychological arousal.
- Embodied teaching led to significantly higher physical activation compared to other methods.
- Physiological synchronization was positive across all methods, highest in distance and frontal teaching.
- Immediate knowledge gain was higher after embodied lessons than frontal lessons.
- No significant differences in long-term knowledge retention were observed.
Conclusions:
- Wearable devices are effective tools for educational research, providing objective data in complex classroom environments.
- Embodied teaching shows promise for enhancing immediate learning outcomes and student engagement.
- Further research is warranted to optimize teaching strategies for sustained knowledge retention.
More Related Videos
10:45A Community-based Stress Management Program: Using Wearable Devices to Assess Whole Body Physiological Responses in Non-laboratory Settings
Published on: January 22, 2018
06:37Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
Published on: December 15, 2023