Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Dual anti-platelet therapy for secondary prevention in intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a network meta-analysis
Giuseppe Reale1, Aurelia Zauli2, Giuseppe La Torre3
1Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa-Collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Insights
Dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) is more effective than single anti-platelet therapy (SAPT) for preventing recurrent strokes in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS). This finding supports DAPT as a key secondary prevention strategy for ICAS patients.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) significantly contributes to stroke and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), carrying a high risk of recurrence.
- Current secondary prevention strategies for ICAS, including antithrombotic therapy and endovascular treatment (ET), lack direct comparative data, particularly between single anti-platelet therapy (SAPT) and dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if DAPT is superior to SAPT in preventing recurrent stroke or TIA in patients with symptomatic ICAS.
- To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing various secondary prevention strategies for ICAS.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed following PRISMA guidelines.
- Included studies investigated secondary prevention (SAPT, DAPT, oral anticoagulant therapy, or ET) for symptomatic ICAS, analyzing data from January 1989 to May 2021.
- The primary efficacy outcome was the recurrence of ischemic stroke/TIA; safety outcomes were also assessed.
Main Results:
- The NMA included 5 trials, with adequate sequence generation and blinded outcome assessment in all.
- Dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) demonstrated superiority over single anti-platelet therapy (SAPT) in reducing stroke/TIA recurrence (OR, 0.59; CI, 0.39-0.9).
- DAPT also showed improved safety compared to oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) and DAPT plus ET, without increasing hemorrhage risk.
Conclusions:
- Dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) is more effective than single anti-platelet therapy (SAPT) for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS).
- DAPT offers a favorable safety profile, not increasing the risk of hemorrhage compared to other treatments.
Background:
Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is a non-marginal cause of stroke/transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and is associated with high stroke recurrence rate. Some studies have investigated the best secondary prevention ranging from antithrombotic therapy to endovascular treatment (ET). However, no direct comparison between all the possible treatments is currently available especially between single and dual anti-platelet therapies (SAPT and DAPT).
Aim:
To establish whether DAPT is more effective than SAPT in preventing the recurrence of ICAS-related stroke, by means of a network meta-analysis (NMA).
Design:
Systematic review and NMA in accordance to PRISMA guidelines.
Data Sources And Methods:
We performed a systematic review of trials investigating secondary prevention (SAPT or DAPT, anticoagulant treatment or ET) in patients with symptomatic ICAS available in MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science from January 1989 to May 2021. We defined our primary efficacy outcome as the recurrence of ischemic stroke/TIA. We analysed the extracted data with Bayesian NMA approach.
Results:
We identified 815 studies and included 5 trials in the NMA. Sequence generation was adequate in all the selected studies while the allocation concealment method was described in one study. All the included studies reported the pre-specified primary outcomes, and outcome assessment was blinded in all the studies. We used the fixed-effect approach as the heterogeneity was not significant (p > 0.1) according to the Cochran's Q statistic. DAPT was superior to SAPT and DAPT + ET in preventing stroke/TIA recurrence [respectively, odds ratio (OR), 0.59; confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.9; and OR, 0.49, CI, 0.26-0.88], while no difference was found between DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC). DAPT was safer than OAC (OR, 0.48; CI, 0.26-0.89) and DAPT + ET (OR, 0.50; CI, 0.35-0.71), while no difference was found between DAPT and SAPT.
Conclusion:
DAPT is more effective than SAPT for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAS, without increasing the risk of haemorrhage.
Registration:
Prospero/CRD42019140033.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

