Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

32.6K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.6K
Standard Deviation01:10

Standard Deviation

17.6K
The most commonly used measure of variation is the standard deviation. It is a numerical value measuring how far data values are from their mean. The standard deviation value is small when the data are concentrated close to the mean, exhibiting slight variation or spread. The standard deviation value is never negative, it is either positive or zero. The standard deviation is larger when the data values are more spread out from the mean, which means the data values are exhibiting more variation.
17.6K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

35.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
35.7K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.4K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.4K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.8K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.8K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.7K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Backscattering Problem for Time-Dependent Potentials.

Annales Henri Poincare·2026
Same author

Negative Eigenvalue Estimates for the 1D Schrödinger Operator with Measure-Potential.

Annales Henri Poincare·2026
Same author

Biodiversity of marine microbes is safeguarded by phenotypic heterogeneity in ecological traits.

PloS one·2021
Same author

A Polyakov Formula for Sectors.

Journal of geometric analysis·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 1, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K

Diversity strengthens competing teams.

J Rowlett1, C J Karlsson1, M Nursultanov2

  • 1Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and the University of Gothenburg, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Royal Society Open Science
|August 12, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new game theoretic model shows how a collection's internal composition impacts its competitive success. This research reveals that increasing diversity can strengthen systems when competing against others.

Keywords:
biodiversitycompetitiondiversityequilibrium strategygame theory

More Related Videos

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.0K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

792

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 1, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.0K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

792

Area of Science:

  • Theoretical Mathematics
  • Game Theory
  • Systems Science

Background:

  • Understanding how individual characteristics aggregate to collective outcomes is crucial across various disciplines.
  • Existing models often struggle to bridge the gap between individual interactions and group-level performance in competitive scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a mathematical model that links the internal composition of a group to its success in inter-group competition.
  • To identify equilibrium points and strategies within this model to understand emergent collective behaviors.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel game theoretic model.
  • Rigorous mathematical analysis to identify all equilibrium points and strategies.
  • Interpolation between individual-level dynamics and ensemble-level consequences.

Main Results:

  • The model successfully interpolates between individual composition and collective repercussions in competition.
  • Identification of equilibrium strategies that dictate group performance.
  • Demonstration that increasing diversity can confer a competitive advantage.

Conclusions:

  • The developed game theoretic framework provides a versatile tool for analyzing competitive ensembles.
  • The findings suggest a potential mechanistic explanation for the prevalence of diversity in biological and physical systems.
  • The model's broad applicability spans fields from ecology to finance.