Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
A vicious circle? Longitudinal relationships between different modes of in-group identity and COVID-19 conspiracy
Paulina Górska1, Marta Marchlewska2, Dagmara Szczepańska2
1Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw.
Abstract:
Since March 2020, when the World Health Organization declared the spread of COVID-19 a global pandemic, conspiracy theories have continued to rise. This research examines the role of different forms of in-group identity in predicting conspiracy thinking in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. We hypothesized that conspiracy thinking would be predicted positively by national narcissism (i.e., a belief in in-group's greatness which is contingent on its external validation and makes in-group members sensitive to psychological threats) but negatively by secure national identification (i.e., a confidently held ingroup evaluation, which serves as a buffer against psychological threats). In a three-wave longitudinal study conducted on a representative sample of adult Poles (N = 650), conspiracy thinking was positively predicted by national narcissism, but negatively by national identification. Further, we found evidence that conspiracy thinking strengthened national narcissism (but not national identification) over time. Implications for intra- and intergroup processes are discussed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
Group Polarization
Groupthink
Social Proof
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Longitudinal Research

