Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Bosniak classification version 2019: a prospective comparison of CT and MRI
Yassir Edrees Almalki1, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha2, Rania Refaat3
1Division of Radiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College, Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
CT and MRI show comparable diagnostic accuracy for classifying complicated renal masses (CRMs) using the Bosniak classification version 2019 (BCv2019). Variations in classification were mainly due to septa characteristics and enhanced nodules, with moderate inter-modality agreement.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Urologic Oncology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Complicated renal masses (CRMs) require accurate classification for appropriate management.
- The Bosniak classification version 2019 (BCv2019) is a standardized system for categorizing CRMs.
- Evaluating the performance of CT and MRI in applying BCv2019 is crucial for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy and inter-modality agreement of CT and MRI for Bosniak classification version 2019 (BCv2019).
- To identify factors contributing to discrepancies in BCv2019 classification between CT and MRI.
Main Methods:
- A prospective multi-institutional study included 63 patients with 67 CRMs.
- Patients underwent both CT and MRI scans, followed by histopathology.
- Three radiologists independently classified CRMs using BCv2019 on both CT and MRI datasets.
Main Results:
- Discordance between CT and MRI findings was observed in 50% of CRMs.
- No significant differences were found in sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy between CT and MRI for BCv2019 classification.
- Inter-reader agreement was substantial for both CT and MRI, while inter-modality agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58).
Conclusions:
- CT and MRI demonstrate comparable diagnostic accuracy and reliability in applying the BCv2019.
- Septal characteristics and the presence of enhanced nodules were primary drivers of classification variations between modalities.
- Despite moderate inter-modality agreement, both imaging techniques are valuable tools for CRM classification.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

