Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Human Genetics01:28

Human Genetics

698
Human genetics provides a profound framework for understanding the interplay between genetic predispositions and human psychology. At the heart of this discipline lies the study of how genes influence physical traits, behaviors, and susceptibility to diseases. Each person carries a unique genetic code that subtly or significantly shapes their psychological and behavioral landscape.
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
698
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

486
Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
486
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder01:29

Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder

292
The development of psychological disorders, which are characterized by deviant, maladaptive, and personally distressing behaviors, has been explored through several theoretical approaches.
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
292
Nature and Nurture01:10

Nature and Nurture

20.7K
Many human characteristics, like height, are shaped by both nature—in other words, by our genes—and by nurture, or our environment. For example, chronic stress during childhood inhibits the production of growth hormones and consequently reduces bone growth and height. Scientists estimate that 70-90% of variation in height is due to genetic differences among individuals, and 10-30% of variation in height is due to differences in the environments that individuals experience,...
20.7K
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

151
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
151
Biological Influences on Intelligence01:30

Biological Influences on Intelligence

192
Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter...
192

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Teaching swimming and water safety skills to children with disability: A systematic review.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same journal

Disability, anti-disability, post-disability: A critical trajectory.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same journal

Multimodal monitoring in newborn infants with stroke improves prediction of post-neonatal epilepsy.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same journal

Development of a new classification for patients with spinal muscular atrophy to predict locomotor and pulmonary function during growth.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same journal

Consensus definition and assessment of trunk control in children and adolescents with neurological conditions.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same journal

الوصف المحدث للاعتلال الحركي الدماغي (الشلل الدماغي).

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Rapid Detection of Neurodevelopmental Phenotypes in Human Neural Precursor Cells NPCs
10:47

Rapid Detection of Neurodevelopmental Phenotypes in Human Neural Precursor Cells NPCs

Published on: March 2, 2018

10.1K

How do genetic tests answer questions about neurodevelopmental differences? A sociological take.

Daniel Navon1

  • 1Department of Sociology, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
|August 13, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Genetic testing for neurodevelopmental differences offers answers but requires careful question framing. The interpretation of genetic results, impacting diagnosis and care, is influenced by social factors and requires stakeholder agency.

More Related Videos

A Pipeline using Bilateral In Utero Electroporation to Interrogate Genetic Influences on Rodent Behavior
06:59

A Pipeline using Bilateral In Utero Electroporation to Interrogate Genetic Influences on Rodent Behavior

Published on: May 21, 2020

4.2K
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

86.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Rapid Detection of Neurodevelopmental Phenotypes in Human Neural Precursor Cells NPCs
10:47

Rapid Detection of Neurodevelopmental Phenotypes in Human Neural Precursor Cells NPCs

Published on: March 2, 2018

10.1K
A Pipeline using Bilateral In Utero Electroporation to Interrogate Genetic Influences on Rodent Behavior
06:59

A Pipeline using Bilateral In Utero Electroporation to Interrogate Genetic Influences on Rodent Behavior

Published on: May 21, 2020

4.2K
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

86.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Neurodevelopment
  • Sociology of Science
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Genetic testing provides diagnostic information for neurodevelopmental differences.
  • Specific genetic conditions like NGLY1 deficiency, fragile X, trisomy X, and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome are relevant.
  • The interpretation and impact of genetic test results are complex and context-dependent.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the multifaceted questions genetic test results can answer regarding neurodevelopmental differences.
  • To analyze how social factors influence the meaning and application of genetic diagnoses.
  • To examine the ethical implications of genetic testing on concepts of a life worth living.

Main Methods:

  • Sociological analysis of the questions addressed by genetic testing.
  • Historical examination of how genetic test results are interpreted.
  • Discussion of implications for social inequalities and stakeholder agency.

Main Results:

  • The questions genetic tests can answer are dynamic and socially contingent.
  • The impact of genetic results on diagnosis, identity, prognosis, and treatment is variable.
  • Genetic testing raises profound questions about life quality that it cannot resolve independently.

Conclusions:

  • Stakeholders must critically select the questions that genetics should address concerning neurodevelopmental differences.
  • Sociological nuances significantly alter the interpretation of genetic diagnoses.
  • Agency in interpreting genetic information is crucial for addressing social inequalities.