Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Clinical Efficacy of Interventional Therapy on Lower Extremity Arteriosclerosis Obliterans and Prognostic Factors
1General Surgery, The First People's Hospital of WenLing, No. 333, Chuanan Road, Wenling City, 317500 Zhejiang Province, China.
Insights
Interventional therapy improves short-term outcomes for lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans (LEASO). However, long-term efficacy is similar to conservative treatment, with higher costs for interventional approaches.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Peripheral Artery Disease
Background:
- Lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans (LEASO) significantly impacts patient mobility and quality of life.
- Effective therapeutic strategies are crucial for managing LEASO and preventing adverse outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the clinical efficacy of interventional therapy compared to conservative therapy for LEASO.
- To identify prognostic factors influencing patient outcomes in LEASO.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 122 LEASO patients (March 2017-March 2019).
- Comparison of short-term (12 weeks) and long-term (3 years) outcomes between conservative (n=72) and interventional (n=50) groups.
- Cox regression analysis for prognostic factors and comparison of adverse events, hospital stay, cost, claudication distance, and ankle-brachial index.
Main Results:
- Interventional therapy showed higher short-term efficacy but similar long-term clinical efficacy compared to conservative therapy.
- The conservative group had longer hospital stays and lower costs but poorer claudication distance and ankle-brachial index.
- Mortality, amputation, and restenosis rates were similar between groups; age and conservative therapy were independent risk factors for prognosis.
Conclusions:
- Interventional therapy offers significant short-term benefits for LEASO patients.
- Long-term outcomes are comparable, but interventional therapy incurs higher costs.
- Treatment selection should consider patient economic status and individual prognosis.
Objective:
This study was designed to analyse the clinical efficacy of interventional therapy on lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans (LEASO) and prognostic factors.
Methods:
A total of 122 patients with LEASO diagnosed in our hospital from March 2017 to March 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Among them, 72 patients who received conservative therapy were assigned to a conservative group, and 50 patients who received interventional therapy additionally based on conservative therapy were assigned to an intervention group. The short-term (12 weeks after therapy) and long-term (3 years after therapy) clinical efficacies on the two groups were compared. Death, amputation, and vascular restenosis (vascular stenosis > 50% in computed tomography reexamination) were defined as unfavourable outcomes, and Cox regression was conducted to analyze the factors influencing the prognosis of patients. The incidence of adverse events in the two groups within 3 years was compared and statistically analyzed. Additionally, the hospital stay, therapy cost, claudication distance, and ankle brachial index were compared between the two groups.
Results:
After therapy, the conservative group showed a notably lower total effective rate than the intervention group (P < 0.05), but the clinical efficacy after 3 years was similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, the conservative group experienced notably longer hospital stay than the intervention group (P < 0.05), and cost less in treatment than the intervention group (P < 0.05). However, the conservative group experienced a notably shorter claudication distance and showed a notably lower ankle brachial index than the intervention group (P < 0.05). The two groups were not significantly different in mortality, amputation rate, and vascular restenosis rate (P > 0.05). Moreover, Cox regression analysis revealed that age and conservative therapy were independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Interventional therapy can substantially improve the short-term efficacy and prognosis of patients with LEASO, but the cost is high, so the therapeutic regimen should be selected according to the patient's economic condition.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
07:48Assessing Therapeutic Angiogenesis in a Murine Model of Hindlimb Ischemia
Published on: June 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care