Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
A reinforcement learning application of a guided Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm for beam orientation selection in
Azar Sadeghnejad-Barkousaraie1, Gyanendra Bohara1, Steve Jiang1
1Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Abstract:
Current beam orientation optimization algorithms for radiotherapy, such as column generation (CG), are typically heuristic or greedy in nature because of the size of the combinatorial problem, which leads to suboptimal solutions. We propose a reinforcement learning strategy using Monte Carlo Tree Search that can find a better beam orientation set in less time than CG. We utilize a reinforcement learning structure involving a supervised learning network to guide the Monte Carlo Tree Search and to explore the decision space of beam orientation selection problems. We previously trained a deep neural network (DNN) that takes in the patient anatomy, organ weights, and current beams, then approximates beam fitness values to indicate the next best beam to add. Here, we use this DNN to probabilistically guide the traversal of the branches of the Monte Carlo decision tree to add a new beam to the plan. To assess the feasibility of the algorithm, we used a test set of 13 prostate cancer patients, distinct from the 57 patients originally used to train and validate the DNN, to solve for 5-beam plans. To show the strength of the guided Monte Carlo tree search (GTS) compared to other search methods, we also provided the performances of guided search, uniform tree search and random search algorithms. On average, GTS outperformed all other methods. It found a better solution than CG in 237 seconds on average, compared to 360 seconds for CG, and outperformed all other methods in finding a solution with a lower objective function value in less than 1000 seconds. Using our guided tree search (GTS) method, we could maintain planning target volume (PTV) coverage within 1% error similar to CG, while reducing the organ-at-risk (OAR) mean dose for body, rectum, left and right femoral heads; mean dose to bladder was 1% higher with GTS than with CG.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Radiation: Applications
The average...
Radiation Pressure: Problem Solving
The average value of the rate of momentum transfer divided by the absorbing area represents the average force...